au1929 wrote:Frank
That which you attribute to me is from the article I posted. However, what do you find to object. The statement does not suggest who you should side with it just makes a statement which if you get past your bias you could not disagree with. ..
...If you want to side with those nations that oppose the war in Iraq, don't pretend that they always have high moral records or any real concern for the victims of military or political power."...
... As far as who is responsible for the current situation. There is plenty of blame to go around. IMO Bush for the invasion and the UN for it's ineptitude.
COMMENT:
1) I didn't attribute the quote, the system did that. If you hit the quote button, that's the way it works.
2) I don't disagree with most of the article, I just wanted to make a statement about who and what I side with -- and I side with America as it was before these bunglers took over.
That was my only point.
3) I disagree with you about the United Nations. In my opinion, the organitzation is doing the best it can under very tough conditions. Having the president of the United States get in a silly, shildish snit -- and pretty much spitting on the UN certainly did nothing to help strengthen it.
In short, au, I was not disagreeing with you (other than the UN part) and I was not really disagreeing with the article. I was just using the material in the article as a convenient segue into some remarks I wanted to make -- and made!