this thread just offers a few bitter old guys an opportunity to express open hostility and heap scorn on other posters for reasons of their own.
Nah, they're not bitter. They're just mad because they can't explain the moronic decision to give this experimental treatment to deathbed recipients even though the manufacturer, the CDC, and the WHO have stated that this experimental treatment doesn't stop infection or transmission. They don't know how to explain that, and so they avoid the issue by calling it silly. So if you'd be a dear and help them conquer their fear of admitting the obvious, that would be great. Maybe if you're firm with them, they'll accept what the manufacturer, the CDC, and the WHO have already confirmed, and just maybe they'll stop preaching on about herd immunity in reference to an experimental treatment that doesn't prevent infection or transmission.
And I think they're frustrated because they have no idea why tony would say that a PCR-test cycle threshold of anything over 35 will spit out meaningless results, and yet remain quiet as a mouse as labs did just that. When they remain as quiet as tony when it comes to answering for that, they give the impression that they're not here to refute ANYTHING . . . kind of like you just did. I mean, people come in here basically to expose what they don't know. You, for instance, were unaware of the existence of VAERS, but that doesn't stop you from continuing here; it should, but it doesn't.
Would you like to be the daredevil and break the mold here by answering just one question. I didn't think so.