Re: Does life have no meaning without religion?
puffthemajicdragonallday wrote:Religion is dependant upon life; while life, in my understanding, is not dependant upon religion, without life, there would be no religion.
Life has no meaning, if it does, someone can tell me what it means.
Just because all words have meaning, doesn't mean that what the word means, has to mean anything. Do you know what I mean?
I would rephrase the question to, "Does life still have no meaning without religion".
Puff, that is so saaaad! I used to feel that way, too, back when I was a junior in college, and "graduated" from being a Pantheist/deist to being an Existentialist sympathizer.
JL Nobody wrote:
Is life meaningful with philosophy, art, and science?
Philosophy, art, science---eventually, when I went thru that Existentialist phase, none of them sufficed to provide rock-bottom meaning. But from this end (no longer an Existentialist), I would say they all can enrich life tremendously, provided they're not seen as an end in themselves.
JL wrote:
In their absence, we have barbarism, with or without religion.
I would fine-tune that a bit: the Brownshirts had "art" (albeit mediocre) and a philosophy of sorts, and they practiced (a diabolical form of) science, but they were still barbarians.