Reply
Mon 30 Nov, 2020 12:56 am
Which is it?
His longtime direct association with the man confers veracity to his narrative...
His longtime direct association with the man confers veracity on his narrative...
@Seizan,
I'm going with 'to'. Not quite sure why, though.
@Seizan,
I think it should be 'on'.
You confer something on or upon, not to.
That’s the correct English, but it’s an odd construction.
I love it when roger lends credence to his contention.
@Lady Lingiton,
Thanks, but I think Deb got me by pointing out the word 'confer'
@Lady Lingiton,
Good lord, is it going to be fun around here again or something?
@Borat Sister,
I sure hope so. I've been disappointed lately.
@Seizan,
I would get rid of confers.
His longtime direct association with the man lends/gives veracity to his narrative.