Does Trump appeal to bullies?

@maxdancona,

It wasn't bad in any way at all.

Have I mentioned that leftist phony outrage is silly?

@oralloy,

oralloy wrote:

It wasn't bad in any way at all.

Have I mentioned that leftist phony outrage is silly?

Hopefully if Trump loses the election, you will be as willing to admit you were wrong as I was 4 years ago.

I do remember after Hillary's "Basket of Deplorables" gaffe... going to a big county fair here and seeing the t-shirts. It wasn't until after the election that I realized what a big deal that was.

I am sure that you understood that Hillary's gaffe was a big deal long before I did. It helps to not be in the same bubble as the person involved.

1 Reply

@maxdancona,

Wrong about it being a gaffe?? Not likely. As I said, leftist phony outrage is silly.

I'm unsure as well why you think Hillary's comment was a big deal. It was already clear that progressives are the enemies of the American people. We don't need progressives to tell us that they are our enemies.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

When you say "progressives are the enemies of the American people"...

... is this your opinion? Or, can I add this to the list of silly things you think are facts?

1 Reply

@maxdancona,

We can call that an opinion. But here is a fact:

Progressives deliberately and maliciously violate people's civil liberties for no reason.

And yes, that's a Second Amendment argument.

2 Replies

@oralloy,

So if I could find a progressive who either

1. Didn't deliberately or maliciously violate people's civil liberties
2. Or who did it for some reason.

Then that would disprove your fact?

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Interesting question....

Do you believe that someone can "violate your rights" by voting the wrong way?

(I think that we can safely add THIS to the list of silly things you claim to be facts).

1 Reply

@maxdancona,

maxdancona wrote:

So if I could find a progressive who either

1. Didn't deliberately or maliciously violate people's civil liberties
2. Or who did it for some reason.

Then that would disprove your fact?

No. If you found an exception, that would not change the reality that most progressives do in fact try to do this.

However, if you found a progressive who opposes violating my civil liberties, I'd be interested in hearing about it. I dislike these attempts to violate my civil liberties. I wish progressives would take up a hobby that didn't involve hurting innocent people.

0 Replies

@maxdancona,

maxdancona wrote:

Interesting question....
Do you believe that someone can "violate your rights" by voting the wrong way?

I don't see how.

maxdancona wrote:

(I think that we can safely add THIS to the list of silly things you claim to be facts).

I'm a little unclear here. I am not asserting any facts in this post.

Even if I had said yes to the above question, I don't think I would be asserting any facts in this post.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

When you said "here is a fact", I assumed that meant that you were, in fact, asserting a fact.

1 Reply

@maxdancona,

Yes. I am indeed asserting a fact.

The fact in question is:

Progressives deliberately and maliciously violate people's civil liberties for no reason.

2 Replies

@oralloy,

Good...

So I AM adding that to the list of silly things you state as fact.

1 Reply

@maxdancona,

What are you adding to the list? What I actually said? Or that other nonsense that I didn't actually say?

Anyway, if you think reality is silly, you are probably a progressive.

0 Replies

@oralloy,

No facts involved. blatantly silly opinion pretending to be fact, as usual in your discourse.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

Wrong again. It is a fact that you can offer no justification for outlawing pistol grips on semi-auto long guns.

You cannot provide any examples of opinion pretending to be fact in any of my posts.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

that law no longer in force outlawed weapons, not grips and there were and are reasons for outlawing those weapons That you don't agree with those reasons does not invalidate the fact that they're there. It just makes you complicit in fatal gun violence.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

MontereyJack wrote:

that law no longer in force outlawed weapons, not grips

Your word games are sophistry.

"Outlawing a gun whenever it has a pistol grip on it" is "outlawing pistol grips on that gun."

MontereyJack wrote:

and there were and are reasons for outlawing those weapons That you don't agree with those reasons does not invalidate the fact that they're there.

Wrong. No such reasons exist.

If such reasons did exist, you could list what those reasons are. You can't.

MontereyJack wrote:

It just makes you complicit in fatal gun violence.

Wrong again. Preventing you from outlawing pistol grips on semi-auto long guns does not make me complicit in fatal gun violence.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

the sophistry is entirely on you.

1 Reply

@MontereyJack,

I didn't make you play sophistic word games in a futile attempt to deny reality.

You decided to do that all on your own.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

You have never been in touch with reality. don't pretend.

1 Reply

Does Trump appeal to bullies?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know