“So oft in theologic wars,
The disputants, I ween,
Rail on in utter ignorance
Of what each other mean,
And prate about an Elephant
Not one of them has seen.”
In machinery drawing, six views are needed to describe a machine part: the top view, the bottom view, the front view, the rear view, the left side view and the right side view.
The authentic guys who claimed “the scientific community” in a professional physics forum yesterday even not yet aware the problems with the traditional Lorentz transformation in the cross direction in SR. Piggy has introduced the “mass – space equation” and solved those problems in able2know a few months ago (details see the thread “Is the sun round or thin?” in the Relativity column of the physics forum. A bit regrettable, piggy doesn’t know how to attach the picture of the “L” shaped circuit in that thread).
Actually, there is another very simple thought experiment to demonstrate the inherent flaw in Einstein’s SR: assume a large rabbit is moving in speed v in frame S, the same angles with all axis x,y,z for simplicity. Then, in frame S, the components of speed v along x,y,z axis are the same. While in frame S’, because the Lorentz transformation formulas in the cross direction is not the same as that of the along direction (the moving direction of frame S’), that’s mean the components of speed v’ along x’,y’,z’ axis are NOT the same. Then, physics rule is not the same in different inertial frames. Einstein contradicted himself. If we resort to the space contraction in all directions which is disclosed by the Mass – Space equation, this flaw can be amended easily.
Piggy really is reluctant to go there and inform them and just let those “wise men” confusing in the whole life.
Cosmos can be fashion, passion and inflation while physics must be step by step.