0
   

induced permanent magnetic field question

 
 
Robinis
 
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2020 03:08 pm
I have housed a pair of nib magnets that are approx. 25cm/1 in apart on a flat surface. I have also laid a metal rod between this pm assembly insulating the rod so it doesn't touch either magnet assembly, with a rubber cushion. Both nib assemblies are in repel. When the rod is between the magnets the rod is magnetic and when I remove the rod the rod is not magnetic. I was always under the impression that in order for a metal rod to be magnetized the rod would have to be moving within that magnetic field or that the magnet would have to physically touch/rub in one direction to become magnetized. which in this instance isn't the case. Please explain.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 655 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
Halcyon
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Sep, 2020 05:35 pm
@Robinis,
I'm not a physicist, but I am in the STEM field. I think that the induced magnetism in the rod is due to the proximity of the other fields. It doesn't have to be moving or touching. Surround a strong magnet with non-magnetic materials and its field extends a ways, so you can then stick a rod next to it (not touching) and that will focus the magnetic field and make it locally stronger than it was without the rod.

I don't know how else to explain it, but it's a thing. Sorry if I wasn't technical enough. I'm on my phone.

Edit, oh yeah, so if you move the metal relative to the magnet, you will induce a current due to the change in flux.

In order to maintain the magnetism after you remove it, you'd have to run it through this field many times. Rubbing is just so you get maximum strength but you don't have to physically touch the other magnet, so that the "iron atoms align" which is all I could find online.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Tesla and Einstein - Discussion by Jasper10
Electric current flows in an open circuit, too! - Discussion by Mitko Gorgiev
What is Ground in electricity? - Discussion by Mitko Gorgiev
CATHODE RAYS ARE NOT CATHODE RAYS! - Discussion by Mitko Gorgiev
THE FLEMING'S LEFT HAND RULE IS NOT VALID! - Discussion by Mitko Gorgiev
A new theory of the electric current! - Discussion by Mitko Gorgiev
What is a battery? - Discussion by Mitko Gorgiev
Faraday's law of induction is not true - Discussion by Mitko Gorgiev
Electromagnetism exercise - Question by dumb-at-eletromag
 
  1. Forums
  2. » induced permanent magnetic field question
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.51 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 07:38:43