Anywho, getting back on topic, is anyone going to touch upon this?:
JGoldman10 wrote:
Doesn't having a sexual attraction to furries or anything anthropomorphic fringe on being bestial, technically speaking?
And this?:
JGoldman10 wrote:
There seems like there is a double standard as far as how fictional characters are dressed is concerned.
It seems like it's "okay" to have female characters wear skimpy, form-fitting and/or provocative attire - anything that draws attention to their chest, butts and crotch area, although some people do complain about that, especially if the characters are teenaged.
But if a male character wears anything drawing attention to his "man parts" people would call that offensive or obscene and protest.
0 Replies
jespah
2
Reply
Fri 26 Jun, 2020 06:41 pm
You know, this could be a really interesting discussion on how female characters in entertainment (not just cartoons) are boxed in by their looks in ways that males are not.
So am I. I've been a Deviantart member for years but I never showcased any work on there. I never showcased any visual art or writings on there. I didn't say I look at fart fetish art or videos on Deviantart. It's not your business what type of stuff I look at on Deviantart.
Why was fart art even mentioned at all? Literally no one was talking about it or even heard of it until JG talked about it. He doesn't make any sense sometimes.
The thread is about Rule 34 material. A lot of fart fetish material is considered pornographic. People make fart fetish material out of fictional characters. That is why I posted about it.
I told you I was a bit hesitant to show any work on Deviantart because I was concerned about people stealing it.
I've been a longtime member of Newgrounds. People on that site were badgering me to showcase work on there. I was hesitant to post any work on there for the same reason.
I have some artwork I made which I've showcased in online photo albums.
