12
   

What's the deal with Rule 34 material?

 
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Jul, 2020 04:36 pm
@JGoldman10,
A lot of horror writers have very strong morals, Stephen King’s works are quite ethical.

I get the feeling you’d be a lot happier living as a monk.
JGoldman10
 
  0  
Reply Mon 27 Jul, 2020 04:38 pm
@Sturgis,
That is not what I am talking about. What is the psychological reason why burp fetishism exists? Why do some people derive sexual pleasure from belches?
Sturgis
 
  3  
Reply Mon 27 Jul, 2020 04:38 pm
@JGoldman10,
Gee, why are you going off topic? You complain about others doing this, so what gives?
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Jul, 2020 04:40 pm
@izzythepush,
Have you no heart? Why should the monks suffer any more?
0 Replies
 
JGoldman10
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 27 Jul, 2020 04:41 pm
@Sturgis,
Burp fetishism has something to do with the topic question because it's considered sexual. A certain portion of Rule 34 material is fantasy burp fetish material.
Sturgis
 
  2  
Reply Mon 27 Jul, 2020 04:45 pm
@JGoldman10,
That is not what I asked.

You began going on about Steven King, almost immediately after decrying others from veering off topic. Why is it that you think it's okay for you but others are to not do so?
0 Replies
 
Rebelofnj
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Jul, 2020 04:46 pm
@JGoldman10,
I'm pretty sure the reasons I and other people gave for Rule 34 artwork can apply to anything.
JGoldman10
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 27 Jul, 2020 05:23 pm
@Rebelofnj,
That doesn't explain why burp fetishism material exists, or why burp fetishism even exists in the first place.

I can understand why fart fetishism exists, but not burp fetishism.
Rebelofnj
 
  3  
Reply Mon 27 Jul, 2020 05:32 pm
@JGoldman10,
I'm just going to post the fetish musical number from American Dad.

JGoldman10
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 27 Jul, 2020 06:40 pm
@Rebelofnj,
That wasn't necessary. I've seen that bit before.
Sturgis
 
  2  
Reply Tue 28 Jul, 2020 12:14 am
@JGoldman10,
Oh boo-hoo.

Just because you have seen it, does not mean everyone else has.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Jul, 2020 04:06 am
@JGoldman10,
You’re talking to the wrong community. This is something only you’re into.e
0 Replies
 
cloa513
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 23 Aug, 2020 08:36 am
@JGoldman10,
There is not porn of every type- try finding natural scenarios with people wearing normal clothes. It does not exist. Dates that have sexuality aren't Tinder or some lurid that sort of porn doesn't exist. Soft core that has person to person contact doesn't exist- everyone who writes it is soft core is just the same as hard core.
JGoldman10
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 23 Aug, 2020 01:39 pm
@cloa513,
I'm a Christian. I'm not going to look that up. People do have sex with their clothes on.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Aug, 2020 01:42 pm
@JGoldman10,
You seem quite well informed, no need to look that up.
0 Replies
 
Teufel
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 23 Aug, 2020 04:09 pm
@JGoldman10,
Why do people make up these imbecilic, entirely meaningless rules? Internet social media really displays just how incredibly dense most people are.

Porn .... Personally I have owned sex shops, clubs, bars and have commercially produced pornography as a producer for near 40 years now. If it is legal somewhere and it'll sell; Then at some point my team and I, we will have made it. And? There is no such thing as perverted, there is no morals nor right/wrong ... There is just what we do, then people decide what it means. Who cares what 'people' think? They do not think for themselves do they, just trot out their learnt behaviours.

Apparently the first ever 'photograph' as we know them, was of a garden in 1826 taken by one Joseph Nicéphore Niépce ... I strongly suspect the world's second photograph arrived after a short conversation which went thus:

Niépce to his secretary .... "Look Ms Dellors, a photograph!"
Ms Dellors .... "That is amazing Sir!"
Niépce ..... "Isn't it! Now just pop all your clothes on that chair ...."

Personally I find the religious to be offensive. Especially when they decide that what they believe is what anyone else should believe. Indeed, when these God botherers dare to question or proffer opinion on what anyone else does my advice would be keep it to yourselves, unlike way too many Catholic priests it appears.

To quote Homer J. Simpson in conversation with Ned Flanders ... "Take it outside, God boy!"
maxdancona
 
  0  
Reply Sun 23 Aug, 2020 05:23 pm
@JGoldman10,
JGoldman10 wrote:

I'm a Christian. I'm not going to look that up. People do have sex with their clothes on.


Most sexual acts involve sticking one body part into another. Sticking a penis into a vagina is probably the most common way for heterosexuals... but there are all sorts of variations. Clothes can get in the way this process in ant case.

In my experience, this almost always involves the removal of clothing. The removal of clothing is often pleasurable in itself. Sex often happens with both people fully naked.
JGoldman10
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 26 Aug, 2020 08:16 am
@Teufel,
Hebrews 13:4 - "Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral."

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - "Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: xneither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."

Galatians 5:19-21 - "Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, cdivisions, envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God."

I didn't write the Book.
JGoldman10
 
  0  
Reply Wed 26 Aug, 2020 08:17 am
@maxdancona,
I know how sex works. I know what is considered natural sex and what isn't. I'm not an idiot. People do have sex with their clothes on; ever heard of "dry humping"?
maxdancona
 
  0  
Reply Wed 26 Aug, 2020 10:19 am
@JGoldman10,
Quote:
People do have sex with their clothes on; ever heard of "dry humping"?


This doesn't meet my definition of "sex".
 

Related Topics

So I just joined Facebook.... - Discussion by DrewDad
YouTube Is Doomed - Discussion by Shapeless
Internet disinformation overload - Discussion by rosborne979
Participatory Democracy Online - Discussion by wandeljw
OpenDNS and net neutrality - Question by Butrflynet
Internet Explorer 8? - Question by Pitter
 
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 11/28/2020 at 07:04:40