Reply
Mon 1 Jun, 2020 10:27 am
Who would like to explain "The tight 95% confidence intervals reported for the hazard ratios are unlikely" in a bit more details?
--------------------
10.
The tight 95% confidence intervals reported for the hazard ratios are unlikely. For instance,for the Australiandatathis would need about double the numbers of recorded deathsas were reported in the paper.
Source:
An open letter to Mehra et al and The Lancet
James Watson
@oristarA,
From my point of view, it’s too poorly worded and vague for me to be certain what the meaning is
It is well written. The authors include dozens of professors from the most renowned universities in the world, such as Harvard, Oxford.
Who's familiar with statistics?
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace