realjohnboy wrote:Re: Tyson. Sure, he was an unsavory character in a corrupt, totally corrupt "sport." But when he was good, when he could come out and throw that first punch in the first round and either end the fight right then or strike fear and dread into his opponent... he was probably one of the best boxers ever. But once he lost that edge, and the fight would drag on into the mid-rounds, he was pretty avearge. That analysis comes from one of my employees, who is a bit of a boxing fan. Would you agree with that, Slappy?
Yes, and I think he lost that "edge" because he's as emotionally stable as....I can't think of anyone that low to compare him to. If he had half a brain, some heart, focus, ect., he could have been dominant longer than he was, IMO. I mean, the guy just GAVE UP to some clown.
Fun fact: McBride lost to a fighter, who's career record is 1-17. His one win was against McBride. Just to give you some insight on how bad of a fighter just beat Mike Tyson.