There is equality between men and women under law. Within the house is another story.
Dominance of one spouse/partner over another is a problem that I have no idea how to correct. It seems to me every time I see or hear about a case, my first question is WHY DO THEY STAY TOGETHER??
So to answer you question, these sterotypes are not going away.
Anyway, do you all think domestic violence will really just disappear if these stereotypes of males and females are destroyed? If so, how can we work to change these ideas?
I've been thinking about this since I went to a 3-day class last week about domestic violence. This class was given by the Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence (FCADV), and is required for any person working or volunteering in Florida with survivors of domestic violence.
Well, this class was a real eye-opener for me, and since then I've been wondering whether I've been complacent or just plain ignorant about domestic violence all these years.
They say domestic violence of men against women is caused by, as Osso pointed out, our society (or culture, if you will) raising males to believe they are, and must remain, in the position of POWER and CONTROL over females.
BorisKitten wrote:I've been thinking about this since I went to a 3-day class last week about domestic violence. This class was given by the Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence (FCADV), and is required for any person working or volunteering in Florida with survivors of domestic violence.
Well, this class was a real eye-opener for me, and since then I've been wondering whether I've been complacent or just plain ignorant about domestic violence all these years.
They say domestic violence of men against women is caused by, as Osso pointed out, our society (or culture, if you will) raising males to believe they are, and must remain, in the position of POWER and CONTROL over females.
It's possible that you were just complacent, just ignorant, both,or possibly the folks running the class you attended are a bit out to lunch as well.
Since the same patterns of domestic abuse are seen (in very similar numbers) within the gay and lesbian communities and the single greatest predictor of whether or not someone will be abusive is whether or not they observed abuse as a child the "men excercising power and control over women" argument doesn't hold up for long.
Johnson and Ferraro completed a study (circa 1999) that encapsulated severl earlier studies and categorized domestic violence into 5 major categories. Three of those categories - "Common Couple Violence", "Violent Resistance" and "Dysphoric-Borderline Violence" have nothing to do with power or control at all.
A 4th category, "Mutual Violent Control", is completely about control but it is a control issue with both partners. Women are just as likely to engage in this type of abuse as men.
Only their last category - "Intimate Terrorism", has a power and control base that represents the issue of male dominence over women. Unfortunantley, this is the category of abuser that is most likely to make the evening news because this type of abuser is the most violent type. As a percentage of the sum total of abusers though, it is in the minority.
Your first sentence makes me wonder whether you're serious... certainly the "as well" part doesn't strengthen your argument. Maybe you should review the rules for this forum.
To return to the facts at hand, the part about witnessing abuse being the single greatest predictor of violence is true according to the FCADV "canon," as is the fact that gay & lesbian coupled have the same rates of violence as hetero couples. Yet they don't seem to think this negates their "power & control" theory. So you think this theory is not very useful, or only useful in a small number of cases?
I've wondered whether the solution could be so... simple as they describe. Not easy to accomplish, mind you, but simple. On the other hand, could judging humans as humans rather than following stereotypes really be a bad thing?
They also taught us that the "Cycle of Violence"* model used to describe this type of abuse for 30+ years only applies in (they say) 51% of known cases. The rest fall into a "Campaign of Violence" model which may have only 1 incident of violence in the whole relationship.
* He abuses her, he apoligizes and says it'll never happen again, things escalate over time, and the cycle begins again.
Other studies (which have their own faults as well, their numbers are probably low) have shown that some 45% of the entire population (both men and women, adults and children) of the US has suffered one or another form of domestic violence. Of that population about 10% falls into the power & control group and some 85% of that is violence by men. When you extrapolate that backout you end up with some 4.5% of the total population being male abusers with power and control issues being the causitive factor. That 4.5% of the population is the target of the feminist theory proponents.
There is certianly no problem with trying to go after that population but doing so at the exclusion of the remaining 40% of the population that are also abusers isn't, IMO, likely to produce the desired results.
I'm no statistician, but you seem to be making an error here. You state that 45% of the US population has suffered abuse, then seem to assume from this that 45% of the US population have committed abuses. There might be one abuser who abuses 45% of the population, or 99% of the population might be abusers, but only abuse 45% of the population. Could you source your statistics?
I think their theory has limited application.
Other studies (which have their own faults as well, their numbers are probably low) have shown that some 45% of the entire population (both men and women, adults and children) of the US has suffered one or another form of domestic violence. .
Now, from what I gather you are working in a women's shelter so I would expect that you would be more likely to come into constant contact with that 4.5% of the population on a daily basis and maybe that's why they have presented things to you in the way they have but it's important to remember that you are dealing with a small and distinct portion of the population and that there is a much larger population of abused out there that you may never come in contact with (professionally) and what works in the segement you deal with doesn't necessarily apply to all of the other segments.
Mind you. I'm NOT saying that men with power and control issues shouldn't be addressed - they certianly should be. I'm just saying that there are a host of other issues that need to be dealt with too if we are going to see meaningful reductions in the total levels of domestic violence.
Very interesting topic Bkitten!
I agree with Noddy, laws do change for the better on
domestic violence. Police officers receive special training,
there are more shelters for women of domestic abuse
and there is counseling available.
To be honest, my concern are mostly the children involved
in domestic violence. I recognize a battered women syndrome and that many abused women will go back to
their abuser in hopes for a better situation - until the
next incident occurs. Yet these women have an option
to call the police, to get help when needed and to get out
of an abusive relationship. But what about the children,
who are mostly abused as well?
Boris, I remember your story and how you have emerged
as a beautiful human being trying to help others in similar
situations. Did you have a place to go to, or someone to confide
in, who would have taken you out of the house?
Domestic violence is often a concealed, dark secret the family guards very carefully. Children have no one to confide in:
their mothers are usually victims as well, and
they are afraid, frightened and intimidated by the violence
at home, they rarely call authorities for help.
So many abused women will go back to their violent spouses,
dragging the children along without considering
their frightening situation.
In order to stop domestic violence, we must look to our
children and educate them first,
so why don't we do more for them,
when they're indeed in such a violent surrounding
without any support system for them?