i know margo! but i can't take full credit, i gotta say pants help
0 Replies
littlek
1
Reply
Wed 25 May, 2005 05:41 pm
As usual, I'm not following your thinking, domgy.
0 Replies
roger
1
Reply
Wed 25 May, 2005 05:45 pm
Watch it! We had a chick kiss a frog only last week, hoping for a prince, I suppose. Now, she croaks by night and catches flies by day.
0 Replies
moondoggy
1
Reply
Sun 29 May, 2005 02:54 am
hey roger how does one have a frog-kissing chick?
0 Replies
moondoggy
1
Reply
Sun 29 May, 2005 02:56 am
littlek wrote:
As usual, I'm not following your thinking, domgy.
you said krissykat (or rather wrote) that "he" (the allegedly wax frog) wasn't real... my thinking being that "he" should probably constitute an "it" under the circumstances
...but then again its probably just over inflated small talk on my part
0 Replies
dlowan
1
Reply
Sun 29 May, 2005 03:04 am
Hmmmm - trying to disagree - impossible....
Can't wax frogs have gonads?
0 Replies
moondoggy
1
Reply
Sun 29 May, 2005 03:12 am
"Can't wax frogs have gonads?"
s'pose it depends on your semiotic sign/signifiers for frog... hmmm; me, I'm thinking Barthes, Foucault, de Certeau...
0 Replies
dlowan
1
Reply
Sun 29 May, 2005 03:32 am
Well, stop it.
NOW!
0 Replies
moondoggy
1
Reply
Sun 29 May, 2005 04:11 am
sheesh Ms D you're right - within minutes of mentioning foucault (above) on this site I find the first legit Q that elicits spontainous deadly serious intelectual gobbledigoop hnfdhiudjnhjdnfpqjhfophsdiuy8324r7uy0237u87yrpiuqyhd0uyfuhofy
0 Replies
msolga
1
Reply
Sun 29 May, 2005 04:11 am
Re: Frogs Take Over the Earth
moondoggy wrote:
Cane toads are.
Taking over the earth, I mean. Starting with Oz. Rapidly!
(But is it correct to call a toad a frog? )
0 Replies
moondoggy
1
Reply
Sun 29 May, 2005 04:18 am
nuh.
0 Replies
msolga
1
Reply
Sun 29 May, 2005 04:22 am
Oooooooh, slimey looking thing it is. And obese!
0 Replies
moondoggy
1
Reply
Sun 29 May, 2005 04:28 am
they're competive sport in Byron Bay
0 Replies
moondoggy
1
Reply
Sun 29 May, 2005 04:30 am
(introducing them to propulsion that is)
0 Replies
dlowan
1
Reply
Sun 29 May, 2005 05:06 am
moondoggy wrote:
sheesh Ms D you're right - within minutes of mentioning foucault (above) on this site I find the first legit Q that elicits spontainous deadly serious intelectual gobbledigoop hnfdhiudjnhjdnfpqjhfophsdiuy8324r7uy0237u87yrpiuqyhd0uyfuhofy
I rest my case.
Come here - I can help you recover from old Fuckorf....
how does one have a frog-kissing chick?
)
