Discreet wrote:Yeah em i cant find something to back up that comment because i assumed life in africa was worse. Maybe i was racist in doing so. Ive been learning alot about rwanda recently so i just stereotyped that as life in Africa. Where people were being sold and even if they stayed in Africa there was genocide and one;s family members were being sold of to the US and other countries so maybe in a sense they wanted to go....lol i don't know
Okay, now I can see your reasoning here.
I'm in Rwanda, going to get shot in the head, along with my family. I have a chance to be a slave in USA...hmmm...which should I do? Of course I'll be the slave if that is the choice.
***
I think one of the major differences here is that many of the countries the slave-traders worked with in the past, in the 18th & 19th centuries when it was big in USA, many of these countries were peaceful and nothing like what you see in Rwanda.
A lot of the situations were not unlike if someone just came to my or your family's house and just took all the people in a certain age range, say 12-30 or whatever, and left or killed the rest. These people were living peaceful, happy lives in Africa.
And yes there may have been a few Africans who were slave hunters and human hunters who would help the European slave-traders find slaves. But these were like the equivalent of some American crimminals going around scouting for Americans to sell as slaves. Just because a few Americans might be making big bucks and helping foreigners collect slaves in the USA, could someone say "well thats okay because the Americans are involved too, I guess they kind of want to be slaves"?
Because that is what you implied when you said some Africans helped find & sell slaves...
In any event, I do see some of your reasoning. If someone is sitting in Rwanda and is going to get shot this instant, s/he might be a bit better off becoming a slave....I'll grant you that.