Free Energy device successfully invented?

I don't know whether your device will work because your links don't.

Beware of Trojan horses behind sketchy links.

Sorry Guys! Those two links I just posted are not working for some reason. I am trying to figure out why.

Hello fresco!
Those two links are not working for a reason I am trying to figure out.

But for those who are curious, you can visit the "Energetic Forum" website and choose the Renewable Energy forum. You can then select page 11 and on this page you will find the title " Free Energy Device successfully Invented". The link there works and you will be able to judge for yourself whether this device will work or not.

Nobody on that forum has been yet able to find a reason why the device will not work.

Enjoy the reading and you can post your feed back here as well.

JP007

Sorry. Can't find it on your page 11. I do however notice a lot of noise about 'free energy fraud', so I would imagine you might have been the focus of that and have come here for support. If so, you are unlikelt to find much of that on a conservative forum like this.

Why not tell us a little about it.

Hi fresco,
It is there on page 11 at the 12th line from the bottom of page 11. Each page on the Renewable Energy forum (Energetic Forum) has two parts. You need to scroll down to the bottom part that is titled" New Threads" and you will find the description of this device at the 12th line from the top bottom.

You should quickly tell the author to take the post down! That's worth a tremendous amount of money. All he's got to do is make some devices, say a car that does not need gasoline, and he'll be rich.

I have a small wind turbine on the roof of my car. It drives a generator/motor that powers the car.

Sure it is.

Hi Roger,,

The device functions as follows: You know that energy is defined as the work done by a force. This means that if we could have an unbalanced or loose force that is capable of performing work continuously and indefinitely, we have free energy.

How to obtain that unbalanced force? Let say we have an object on which two equal forces are acting in opposite directions (This object could be a cylindrical container full of a pressurized gas. The gas is applying two equal and opposite forces on the base and on the top of the cylindrical container). If we could reverse one of the two forces acting on the object and have the two forces acting as external forces on the object in the same direction, we will have a net force or resultant force acting on the object and this resultant force will cause the object to move, producing energy.

Because the system used to reverse one of the two forces acting on the object need help from gravity, the object on which a force reversal has been performed will be able to move in the vertical direction only (up and down). This object will then have an increased weight compared to an identical object on which the force reversal mechanism has been disabled.

By mounting the two objects on a crankshaft, the object on which the force reversal is active will be heavier and it will be able to lift the object on which the force reversal has been disabled. The crankshaft will then spin, propelled by the difference of weight between the two objects. By alternating the force reversal between the two objects, the crankshaft will continue to spin and the force spinning it can be used to supply mechanical energy to a generator and produce electricity or be used to put in motion an automobile.

The Post on the Energetic Forum (Renewable Energy) contains a detailed description of the process described above and everything is explained, with all the drawings and mathematical calculations provided.
As you read that file, what you will need to scrutinize closely is the method used to reverse a force acting on an object, without the need for an outside anchoring object. If you agree with the method used to reverse the force, then we have free energy.

I have to tell you also that I have been able to have the proposed design scrutinized by one expert in physics, and this physicist could not find a reason why the device wouldn’t functions as expected. This physicist used to teach mechanical engineering courses at one famous American university.

You may be asking yourself why I decided to publicly disclose this invention this way: Simply put, I have been unable to find any investor who could accept to fund this invention in order to bring it to the market. I have come to a final design for this device several years ago and all my efforts to find an investor have failed because of the general skepticism about this kind of invention by the scientific community. I hope that with the help of the members of this forum we can be able to find a way to change the opinion of the scientific community about free energy and move forward with this breakthrough invention, which has the potential of changing the course of humanity.

I have applied for a provisional patent for this invention in the US.

Hello Engineer,
I have to tell you that thinks are more complicated than that. I have come to the final design of this device some years ago and I have been surprised buy how nobody want to hear about this kind of invention. Everybody believe what the scientific community says and you can't find an investor willing to fund the development of this kind of invention. Everybody say it want work without even looking at what you are proposing.

I appreciate the explanation.

T. Boone Pickens might be interested.

Energy is not defined as work done by a force. Your first sentence is wrong...

From that point on, what you wrote is pure nonsense.

Man, that's clever! And the faster the car moves, the more electricity is generated.

But it will only start on windy days.

Always park on a hill. I once had a '53 Chevy that always had to have a hill to get it started. I also never parked in a place I never needed to back out of.

I too have a wind turbine on my car, its hooked up to a fan providing fresh air.