POV based on evidence is more reliable than believing in an omniscient thing without a physical identity.
No. I understand that many humans on this planet believe in a religion be it Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, or the thousands of religions practiced in this world. For them, it's their reality. My reality just happens to be different. My first belief is in what scientists tell us about our environment. By their research, they believe this planet is over 4.5 billion years old, and that humans are the product of the evolution from the primate family of animals. Whatever happened and will happen on this planet is the result of our environment: Nature, and now human production of CO2. https://earthhero.com/carbon-emissions/
Life is a tale told by an idiot...full of sound and fury, signifying nothing
That's nonsense. In practical terms 'truth' is what is agreed to be the case in a consensual context, and is subject to negotiation. There is a plethora of philosophical literature supporting this position from Kant to present day Pragmatism, whereas you appear to be relying on a layman's 'common sense'.
Mine is an 'informed pov'. Is yours ?
BTW The trouble (sic) with Absolutist's is that they are afraid(sic) of Shakespeare's observation that:
Quote:Life is a tale told by an idiot...full of sound and fury, signifying nothing
Rate of return 15.8% As of 09/30/2018
It's obvious you don't know Fresco for long...his position on Truth is not negotiable. In fact, his degree of certainty that there is no truth is the only truism he believes in and speaks about in the forums for the last decade. You are wasting your time with a person that has no care for consistency in his statements. For him, it is absolutely true that there is no truth...no comments.