@spendius,
spendius wrote;
Quote:If it doesn't mean anything then there's no point the facility being here.
I'm not particularly fond or otherwise of the facility. Not sure why it is even here if I can click a post up or down several notches. One click per visit would seem to be a fairer system. That said, I'm more a casual observer here rather than a regular hack, so what is my two cents worth?
spendius wrote; Quote:An up-thumber is merely agreeing with something and there's not much else to say.
Or, in this case, redistributing the "wealth" of the forum? I can click three times on the one post? ??? Dodgy to the max. Does it really matter, in the long run?
spendius wrote;Quote: A down-thumber is disagreeing with no more than a raspberrry. How does one deal with disagreement that doesn't explain.
Take it on the chin. The fact that the down thumber couldn't be arsed coming up with a rebuttal points to a desertion of duty, coupled with a dearth of direction, married to a lack of ability. I would take that as a compliment personally, and an advantageous circumstance, wholly. Such a shame you can't readily identify and demoralise the offending party for their lack of identity/plausability.
spendius wrote;Quote: I thought it was an interesting idea that the pool of candidates is being squeezed between the two opposing forces I mentioned. The virtuous Christian is out because he doesn't want to preside over a blatantly libertine society and a libertine is out because the hypocrites will crucify him for an itsy-bitsy orgy with a group of consenting adults or smoking a few joints.
It's a battle-ground for sure. It's not my forte. I'm leaning towards a secular cultist movement that involves fishing and hunting and gathering.
spendius wrote; Quote:The quality of candidates is bound to be a function of the size of the pool.
I think that this forum may actually represent a forward culture, rather than a backward one.
My opinion only.