Where is the US economy headed?

Perhaps they could have clarified the data a bit better, but it appears that the way GSA presented the data is the biggest problem, not Fox. In fact, it appears that government building square footage increased by about 8% in just one year, parados, and that proves Fox had the general thrust of the news right, that the government was increasing their building space, not decreasing it.

Quote:

Perhaps they could have clarified the data a bit better, but it appears that the way GSA presented the data is the biggest problem, not Fox. In fact, it appears that government building square footage increased by about 8% in just one year, parados, and that proves Fox had the general thrust of the news right, that the government was increasing their building space, not decreasing it.

It doesn't prove anything since you can't tell us which agency had the increases in square footage.

In fact it only points out further lies by FOX to bring this up. You repeat the lies told by FOX as if they had some basis in fact. They don't. You are now making things up okie. Is that what a NEWS organization is supposed to do? Make things up?

Which agencies increased square footage? Can you tell us it wasn't the military? If so, where are the facts?

The GSA never calls it 2 buildings. Your inability to read simple English doesn't make a building asset 2 buildings. It only shows you have an inability to read simple English.

Fox reported what GSA reported. Whats wrong with that? At least they reported it. What other news organization reported it? Name one of those other worthless organizations you think are so great.

I don't know, and what does it matter? They are all costing us money. If you want to talk details, we can do that, and so can Congress, but at least Fox brought an important issue to light, another probably broken promise by Obama.

Okay, call a "building" a "building asset," who cares?

And your point for all this is?

It was GSA that decided to count building assets instead of buildings, parados, not Fox.

Also, I think you are lying about Fox's reporting. They gave you the source, which was the government itself, which invented the term "building asset," not Fox.

If anecdotal evidence means anything or not, but it does to me. I frequent a town that recently moved the Forest Service and BLM into a bigger building, not a smaller one, and I would bet the utilities are higher too.

For example, do you have data showing a reduction in government spending on their office space? I doubt it.

His contention is that SS is a redistribution of wealth, going from current workers to retired ones. He claims that there is no legal contract requiring continued payments to us old folks at any set level.
If that is the case, SS can, if Congress agrees, cap benefits to the wealthiest.

In the United States, approximately 79 million babies were born during the Baby Boom. Much of this cohort of nineteen years (1946-1964) grew up with Woodstock, the Vietnam War, and John F. Kennedy as president.