114
   

Where is the US economy headed?

 
 
okie
 
  0  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2010 07:53 pm
@realjohnboy,
rjb, interesting post, and thanks for attempting to keep things lighthearted and civil here.

In regard to the 2$, I think it depends upon whether there was proper disclosure of what really happens with the transactions. If the online company had a special deal with the motel, then that needs to be disclosed as to the actual price of the room, along with the actual tax being collected. There should be a receipt produced that shows the room price as $80, and if there is not, if it is a deceptive receipt, then the state has a case. For example, if the motel is receiving the charged amount of $100, but later gives the online booking agent a finders fee or something for the booking in the amount of $20, then yes, the motel has committed fraud in reporting its lodging tax to the taxing authority. Or if the booking company is receiving part of the room fee but is not reporting it as a lodging fee to the taxing authority as required, then that may be fraud on the part of the booking company. I think it all depends upon how the transaction is handled, how the money or charges flow or pass from the customer to the companies involved in the process. At least that is what I would think.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2010 07:53 pm
@talk72000,
Clinton had Congress his first two years...The fact that the Dem's had not yet run the moderates out of town was a good thing, though they did quickly follow the Republicans in doing just that.
talk72000
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2010 07:57 pm
@hawkeye10,
Jerry Falwell was a big problem. Thank goodness he is gone.
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2010 09:59 pm
@okie,
Quote:
I am here to speak what I believe to be correct and right in regard to political issues


Do you think you could find a mature manner of expression? I read part of your left v right thread and you lost it within a few hours. Walter, Beth, Setanta and others pointed out to you how unreasonable your behavior was.

I told you time and time again, I never insult first.

But, you consider being told the truth an insult.

For a man approaching 70, you are very immature.
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2010 10:03 pm
@talk72000,
We still have NEwt Gingrich and he is raising more money faster than any other republican.
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2010 12:10 am
@plainoldme,
Oh boy, one of the Democrats favorite whipping boys, old Newt. I bet they are salivating at the possibility of Newt running!
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2010 12:11 am
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:

Do you think you could find a mature manner of expression?
That from the epitome of maturity, ha ha!!!! Laughing
0 Replies
 
talk72000
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2010 01:31 pm
@plainoldme,
Isn't a newt a lizard or amphibian?
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2010 07:18 pm
@talk72000,
I prefer the Geico Gecko. He smiles rather than leers.

Did you read Dune? Remember the Face Dancer? That's the image Newt evokes.
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jul, 2010 07:44 pm
@talk72000,
talk72000 wrote:

Isn't a newt a lizard or amphibian?

Here is a nonpolitical newt:
http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/resources/usfws/stripednewt.jpg/medium.jpg
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Aug, 2010 12:20 pm
@okie,
Looks a lot more honest than the political one.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  0  
Reply Sun 1 Aug, 2010 02:45 pm
Quote:

ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/suppl/empsit.cpseea1.txt
Year……TOTAL US CIVIL EMPLOYMENT
1980……………..99 miillion [CARTER]
2000……………137 million [CLINTON]
2007………..….146 million [BUSH43]
2008………….. 145 million [BUSH43]
2009,……….....140 million [OBAMA]
2010.……………139 million [OBAMA] (June)

Year.…….PERCENT OF CIVILIAN POPULATION EMPLOYED
1980…………………………………….59.2 [CARTER]
1988…………………………………….62.3 [REAGAN]
1992…………………………………….61.5 [BUSH41]
2000…………………………………….64.4 [CLINTON]
2007…………………………………….63.0 [BUSH43]
2008…………………………………….62.2 [BUSH43]
2009…………………………………….59.3 [OBAMA]
2010…………………………………….58.5 [OBAMA] (June)

0 Replies
 
talk72000
 
  0  
Reply Tue 3 Aug, 2010 04:08 pm
@plainoldme,
I read that Dune science fiction. I didn't see the movie with Kyle Macclachlan.
talk72000
 
  0  
Reply Tue 3 Aug, 2010 04:09 pm
@okie,
Thanks. Laughing Mr. Green Twisted Evil Drunk
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Tue 3 Aug, 2010 04:29 pm
@talk72000,
Ah, Kyle MacLachlan . . . he does have a greasiness about him, doesn't he? A friend of mine is suspicious of any production in which he appears. I liked what is called the "Ethan Hawke Hamlet" in which MacLachlan played Claudius. W good adaptation.
talk72000
 
  0  
Reply Tue 3 Aug, 2010 04:42 pm
@plainoldme,
I have only seen a few movies with him from DVDs so I can't make any worthwhile comments. Just from the posters he seemed such a serious guy that I never thought too much about him.

I didn't see the movie as I didn't think they could pull off the special effects as computer graphics had not been developed yet.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2010 05:01 pm
I don't know if it's a straw in the wind but rumours abound here that China is buying out the American owners of Liverpool Football Club. It seems China has $2 trillion available for suchlike activities.

It won't be long before America's love affair with baseball and American football will look like a stubborn persistence with whippet racing.

talk72000
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2010 07:24 pm
@spendius,
American football is really flying rugby i.e. the ball flies.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  0  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 09:52 am
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:
Why would anyone want the respect of a man who thinks fascists are on the left?

Why would anyone respect a woman or man who thinks fascists and nazis are on the right?
Quote:

http://www.crusader.net/texts/mk/mkv2ch01.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler
Volume Two: The National Socialist Movement
Chapter I: Philosophy and Party
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ON FEBRUARY 24, 1920, the first great public demonstration of our young movement took place. In the Festsaal of the Munich Hofbräuhaus the twenty-five theses of the new party's program were submitted to a crowd of almost two thousand and every single point was accepted amid jubilant approval.

With this the first guiding principles and directives were issued for a struggle which was to do away with a veritable mass of old traditional conceptions and opinions and with unclear, yes, harmful, aims. Into the rotten and cowardly bourgeois world and into the triumphant march of the Marxist wave of conquest a new power phenomenon was entering, which at the eleventh hour would halt the chariot of doom.

It was self-evident that the new movement could hope to achieve the necessary importance and the required strength for this gigantic struggle only if it succeeded from the very first day in arousing in the hearts of its supporters the holy conviction that with it political life was to be given, not to a new election slogan, but to a new philosophy of fundamental significance.
...

If allowed to persist, leftists advocating socialism inevitably become corrupted by their power and establish dictatorships: for example, Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Ho Chi Minh, Pol Pot, et cetera.
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 10:58 am
@ican711nm,
Shall we start a daily count down on ican's IQ? Has it dropped its daily degree yet?

Here's a little filmed bio of ican when he was on a quiz show:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf8SIGpw5do
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The States Need Help - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fiscal Cliff - Question by JPB
Let GM go Bankrupt - Discussion by Woiyo9
Sovereign debt - Question by JohnJD
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 03/06/2025 at 09:17:27