Judging by my casual TV-watching, an increasingly confident strain of common wisdom holds that America's high unemployment rate---
9.5%---refutes the Keynesian case for stimulus. In that light, I thought it might be instructive to recall the Keynesian prognosis when Obama first outlined his stimulus plan.
On January 6---Obama hadn't even taken office yet---Paul Krugman looked at the numbers and found that the stimulus was a half-measure and didn't
nearly accomplish what was needed. Summing up in the last paragraph of his post, Krugman predicted the following:
Paul Krugman wrote:I see the following scenario: a weak stimulus plan, perhaps even weaker than what we’re talking about now, is crafted to win those extra GOP votes. The plan limits the rise in unemployment, but things are still pretty bad, with the rate peaking at something like 9 percent and coming down only slowly. And then Mitch McConnell says “See, government spending doesn’t work.”
Let’s hope I’ve got this wrong.
I don't think he got this wrong at all. Indeed his prognosis looks pretty accurate today. If there is an equally accurate January-2009 prediction by a conservative economist, I would sure appreciate a link to it.