@realjohnboy,
realjohnboy wrote:
I have no issue with an auto insurance company looking at public records re how many speeding tickets I may have, Fox.
I am liberal politically. You are conservative. I am a bit troubled by the notion that "people" are looking over my shoulder into private transactions. Does that not bother you?
You keep saying that you're liberal, yet you keep preaching one of the most conservative doctrines on A2K .
No, I don't want people looking over my shoulder into private transactions--I take my personal liberty and unalienable rights quite seriously. Nevertheless we both submit our financial transactions to government scrutiny all the time. The IRS, for instance, can peruse our bank statements or check our books any time it wants to. We give our insurance company permission to audit our sales and/or contracts and payroll taxes to satisfy requirements for work comp and general liability insurance, and if you've never been through a wage/hour audit conducted by the state, count yourself very blessed. Our auto company bases our auto premiums not only on the public record but also on where we garage our vehicle, what we use it for, where we drive it and how far, and other factors. We willingly provide a mortgage company with all manner of personal information and the rate we receive is generally affected by the information we provide.
And every time we use our credit card, we telegraph where we are and, by implication, some information about what we are purchasing or what we are doing.
So it really isn't a matter of the credit card looking over our shoulder at our private transactions. We are freely giving them that information.
The question is, should a credit card company be able to adjust the interest rate to more accurately reflect a perceived risk just as an insurance company or mortgage company adjusts its rates in response to perceived risk?