@realjohnboy,
Geez RJB, if you apologize for a post no longer than that, there's a whole bunch of us who are certainly going straight to hell.
The employees 'under the government thumb' metaphor wasn't really clear but it was intended to illustrate still more government employees which I don't see as a good thing. The only significant job growth we have seen out of three months of stimulus is a giant growth in government work force--virtually every other sector has lost jobs. I don't have much confidence that the government will be able to run a business profitably and that could easily leave we the taxpayers paying all those additional government salaries.
And one point I made that you didn't address was my distaste for government competing with the private sector.
I certainly had no problem with President Bush and President Obama and the Congress being proactive in the financial crisis though I think they might have headed it off if Congress had been willing to acknowledge the warning bells when they were first sounded in a major way. But okay, it didn't so by late 2008 they had to deal with the problem. I could see any number of ways that could have been done far more effectively and economically and fiscally responsibly than the way it was done. And, according to a local banker friend, credit has eased some in recent weeks but only marginally and that marginal improvement had little or nothing to do with the bailout.
I'm a small, limited, efficient government and free market person though, and I'll admit that I am pessimistic when it comes to anything outside of its Constitutionally mandated responsibilities that government presumes to do for us that requires our money to do it.