114
   

Where is the US economy headed?

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Aug, 2008 12:36 pm
Jobless rate rises to 4-year high of 5.7 percent

By JEANNINE AVERSA, AP Economics Writer 1 hour, 5 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The nation's unemployment rate climbed to a four-year high of 5.7 percent in July as employers cut 51,000 jobs, dashing the hopes of an influx of young people looking for summer work.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Aug, 2008 01:11 pm
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Aug, 2008 01:13 pm
c.i. wrote :

Quote:
"... the financial adviser at citi Bank recommended an investment even though I told her my investment needs were "conservative" ...


sorry , c.i. !
i'm sure the financial adviser understood you to mean " i'm a CONSERVATIVE ! ..." and she took her anger out on you !

next time specify " i am a liberal with CONSERVATIVE investment needs " - but who knows how the investment adviser will take those comments ?

sorry , c.i. - i sure don't want to laugh at your expense - it happened to me two years ago - let's cry together !

(an old german saying : "share good fortune with a friend and it will be twice the fortune ; share misery with a friend and it will be half the misery ! " .)
hbg
Laughing Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Aug, 2008 01:20 pm
IS ARNOLD WRONG ?

Quote:
SACRAMENTO - Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger made good on his promise Thursday and ordered 20,000 temporary workers laid off and the pay of 200,000 state employees slashed to the federal minimum wage until the state has a budget.

At a morning news conference, Schwarzenegger said California faces a lack of cash as the state budget crisis enters its second month.

"I have a responsibility to make sure our state has enough money to pay its bills," Schwarzenegger said. "This is not an action I take lightly."

The governor also apologized to the laid-off employees, but said he had no other choice.

Area legislators from both parties derided the order as an unnecessary stunt. State Controller John Chiang has stated that he will disregard the governor's order and continue issuing checks at the full rate.

(i wonder if the cheques will be honoured ?)

"The order wasn't necessary," said state Assemblyman Anthony Adams, R-Claremont, whose district includes parts of the San Gabriel Valley. "Making these people suffer isn't going to pass the budget any sooner."




read article in full :
CALIFORNIA
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Aug, 2008 06:59 pm
food stamps r us.

yay me , im a statistic i read about.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Aug, 2008 01:18 pm
Let me politely appeal all the global citizens who peruse this forum to hel USA's economy to rejuvanate.( Forget about American politics)
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Aug, 2008 01:25 pm
The feds took over the eight bank in trouble on Friday (yesterday). It's only the beginning of bank seizures, and no "stimulus" package is going to save us from this economic downturn.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Aug, 2008 03:40 pm
Not all is bleak about our economy. According to a NYT article, the cost of energy and transportation may make imports/exports too expensive to continue on at the current rate of trade. The idea being tossed around is the fact that it may soon be cheaper to produce more products close to home where transportation costs will be much cheaper. Probably not the total picture, but an issue that should be in the forefront of US companies to consider before building that new factory in China or India.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Aug, 2008 03:50 pm
The US government's budget deficit is expected to soar to a record $482 billion in the next fiscal year, the White House budget office has said.

The Office of Management and Budget said on Monday it blamed the "recent economic slowdown" for the record figure.

The budget deficit measures the gap between how much the government spends and what it raises through taxes.

Analysts say the news means the next US president may be urged to work on slashing the deficit instead of adding to it with expensive spending programmes such as those promised by both candidates

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2008/07/2008728181152828140.html
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Aug, 2008 04:26 pm
MSNBC reports (excerpt from a three page report) :

Quote:


what's going on stateside ?
is this really a fullblown economic crisis ?
so far i had assumed that the reports in the NYT and from various TV news were perhaps too pessimistic .
i now read that even the casinos and mega-yacht brokers are reporting a drop in business .
when both the small players - casino gamblers - and the big players - mega-yacht buyers - are starting to cut back , it concerns me a bit .
the assumption had always been that in hard economic times gambling revenues would tend to be stable and even rise - apparently not this time .
perhaps a new/revised economic model is required to better assess the economic problems of the United States ?
hbg

full report :
BUDGET CRISIS ?
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Aug, 2008 04:34 pm
The political system, once again, is rewarding failure. The Fed is an unreliable watchdog, ideologically biased and compromised by its conflicting obligations. Is it supposed to discipline the big money players or keep them afloat? Putting the secretive central bank in charge, with its unlimited powers to prop up troubled firms, would further eviscerate democracy, not to mention economic justice.

The nation, meanwhile, is flirting with historic catastrophe. Nobody yet knows how bad it is, but the peril is vastly larger than previous episodes, like the savings and loan bailout of the late 1980s. The dangers are compounded by the fact that the United States is now utterly dependent on foreign creditors--Japan and China lead the list--who have been propping us up with their lending. Thanks to growing trade deficits and debt, foreign portfolio holdings of US long-term debt securities have more than doubled since 1994, from 7.9 percent to 18.8 percent as of June 2007. If these countries get fed up with their losses and pull the plug, the US economy will be a long, long time coming back.

The gravest danger is that the national economy will weaken further and spiral downward into a negative cycle that feeds on itself: as conditions darken, people hunker down and wait for the storm to pass--consumers stop buying, banks stop lending, producing companies cut their workforces. That feeds more defaulted loan losses back into the banking system's balance sheets. This vicious cycle is essentially what led to the Great Depression after the stock market crash of 1929. I offer not a prediction but a warning. The comparison may sound farfetched now, but US policy-makers and politicians are putting us at risk of historic deflationary forces that, once they take hold, are very difficult to reverse.

A more aggressive response from Washington would address the real economy's troubles as seriously as it does Wall Street's. Financial firms have lost capital on a huge scale--more of them will fail or be bought by foreign investors. But Wall Street cannot get well this time if the economy remains stuck in the ditch. Washington needs to revive the "animal spirits" of the nation at large. The $152 billion stimulus package enacted so far is piddling and ought to be three or four times larger. Instead of sending the money to Iraq, we should be spending it here on getting people back to work, building and repairing our tattered infrastructure, investing in worthwhile projects that can help stimulate the economy in rough weather.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080818/greider
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Aug, 2008 04:38 pm
hbg, There will always be some rich folks feeling the pinch of any economy in similar condition as ours; some were the speculators in property during the boom years when they thought their asset holdings in the millions of dollars would shield them from an economic downturn, they gambled and lost.

Many will be returning their yachts and airplanes, because there's no more cash to be borrowed to pay on their loans.

The higher you are on the food chain with highly leveraged assets, the farther they will fall. Many will be lucky to keep their mansions/homes and MBZs.
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Aug, 2008 04:49 pm
hamburger wrote:


what's going on stateside ?
is this really a fullblown economic crisis ?

Yes, it is, hamburger. The real wake up call will come this winter, when folks cant afford to heat their homes.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Aug, 2008 05:17 pm
c.i. wrote :

Quote:
hbg, There will always be some rich folks feeling the pinch of any economy in similar condition as ours; some were the speculators in property during the boom years when they thought their asset holdings in the millions of dollars would shield them from an economic downturn, they gambled and lost.


last saturday's NYT reported of the concern that the luxury goods stores near wallstreet have .
one store owner worried that if there are insufficient bonus payments to the brokers/dealers on wallstreet , he'll be stuck with a lot of expemsive baubles at christmas-time !
he said that the weks before christmas are the real moneymaker for his store .
(makes a grown man cry Crying or Very sad )
hbg

ps. i usually "splurge" on saturday by buying the NYT - hope that will help them to continue publishing - really wouldn't want them to go under .
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Aug, 2008 06:25 pm
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Aug, 2008 09:57 pm
I knew this was in the works before the NYT confirmed what is not now new news. Middle class families are now going to food banks to feed their families. With their salaries remaining stagnant during a period of increased cost for fuel and food, not many can survive.
***********

Housing Lenders Fear Bigger Wave of Loan Defaults
By VIKAS BAJAJ

Homeowners with good credit are falling behind on their payments in growing numbers, just as the problems with subprime mortgages have begun to level off.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Aug, 2008 10:05 pm
Ramafuchs wrote:
The political system, once again, is rewarding failure. The Fed is an unreliable watchdog, ideologically biased and compromised by its conflicting obligations. Is it supposed to discipline the big money players or keep them afloat? Putting the secretive central bank in charge, with its unlimited powers to prop up troubled firms, would further eviscerate democracy, not to mention economic justice.

The Fed isn't an unreliable watchdog, it's a watchdog prohibited from watching all the relevant markets that need it. The failure of the Fed to regulate quasi-financial instruments outside of traditional banking wasn't caused by its ideology. It was caused by the ideology of the elected politicians who wrote the rules for the Fed -- and by the voters who elected those politicians.

But, as Friedrich Hayeck so eloquently put it: "When the course of civilization takes an unexpected turn -- when, instead of the continuous progress which we have come to expect, we find ourselves threatened by evils associated by us with past ages of barbarism -- we naturally blame anyone but ourselves." I couldn't have said it better myself.
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Aug, 2008 10:18 pm
somewhere somebody is makin money off aof all this.

follow the profit.


all i can say.


Who is making profit?
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Aug, 2008 03:18 pm
This is my view.
Does anbody care about the wotth of toile paper?
Rama
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Aug, 2008 05:25 pm
Good evening all.
I have been away from this discussion for awhile, so I am still unclear, okie, why the oil companies want rights to more off-shore areas when then already have rights that they have not developed.
Mr McCain wants to give them more and Mr Obama, in a flip-flop, seems to want to give them more. But that resource, oil off the coast, is a decade away.
Mr McCain says we should go nuke. 40 plants, I think I heard him say, But where, and when and where would the waste go. But that solution. if it is a solution, would be decades away.

What p*sses me off is that is that neither of these guys seems to be too concerned about, for example, this winter in New England. It is going to get cold there.
End of rant.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The States Need Help - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fiscal Cliff - Question by JPB
Let GM go Bankrupt - Discussion by Woiyo9
Sovereign debt - Question by JohnJD
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.5 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 08:25:10