114
   

Where is the US economy headed?

 
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 12:39 pm
C I
William Blake had said
""You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough."
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 02:44 pm
Is there such a thing as "too much money"?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 03:38 pm
Miller wrote:
Is there such a thing as "too much money"?



Yes. Too much money creates inflation - as is the current status of the US dollar.

The feds attempts to control inflation by adjussting the short-term rates by a quarter point means nothing in the world where energy and food costs continues to escalate in double digits.

Most consumers do not understand macro-economics. The value of the dollar continues its downward slide as our dollar becomes less valuable, because most countries understand that the US dollar is over-valued and over-supplied. The only benefit for the US is that our products and services become more competitive in the world markets, and our balance of payments gets a free ride; our balance of payment is reduced by about one-third.

Our future still doesn't look very rosey; the full extent of the subprime debacle hasn't been revealed.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 04:15 pm
I'm talking about the individual and MONEY...
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 04:30 pm
Miller wrote:
I'm talking about the individual and MONEY...


Of course the answer is yes. What the hell would you need all that money for?

There is no overall utility in owning a slice of our shared resources so large. Only the opportunity to further one's avarice.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 04:32 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Miller wrote:
I'm talking about the individual and MONEY...


Of course the answer is yes. What the hell would you need all that money for?

There is no overall utility in owning a slice of our shared resources so large. Only the opportunity to further one's avarice.

Cycloptichorn


Give me some and I 'll show you! Laughing
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Nov, 2007 04:34 pm
Miller wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Miller wrote:
I'm talking about the individual and MONEY...


Of course the answer is yes. What the hell would you need all that money for?

There is no overall utility in owning a slice of our shared resources so large. Only the opportunity to further one's avarice.

Cycloptichorn


Give me some and I 'll show you! Laughing


You joke, but my point stands. The pursuit of vast sums of money is an addiction akin to gambling and drug use. It is not a virtue to be lauded by a problem to be treated.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 03:44 pm
White House economic forecast more optimistic than others

International Herald Tribune, The Associated PressPublished: November 29, 2007






WASHINGTON: The White House issued an economic forecast Thursday that called for "solid growth" through next year, a prediction more optimistic than that of the Federal Reserve and far more optimistic than those of many analysts on Wall Street.

The administration predicted that the U.S. economy would expand by 2.7 percent in 2008, that unemployment would remain below 5 percent and that the outlook would be even better in 2009.

By contrast, Fed officials are predicting "subpar" growth through next year, starting with a sharp slowdown over the next six months. The "central tendency" of forecasts by Fed policy makers is for growth to slow to between 1.8 percent and 2.5 percent next year.

The White House was closer to the central bank on its estimate about unemployment, predicting that it would average 4.9 percent next year - up only slightly from 4.7 percent. But many analysts think the central bank's unemployment forecast is itself too optimistic, because it is inconsistent with its forecast for slower growth.

The White House forecast came after government data issued Thursday showed that U.S. home prices had marked a quarterly decline for the first time in 13 years. Home prices slipped 0.4 percent nationwide in the July-September period, compared with the previous quarter, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight said


There is none so blind as one who will not see.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 03:49 pm
Au
It depends.
But most of the economists around the globe are very cautious to predict the future .
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 03:53 pm
on CNBC this morning several commentators discussed the various measures the U.S. government is undertaking to help financial institutions and others that have been hit hard by the subprime mortgage deals .
one of the older chaps finally added his two cents worth : "yea , and it'll me done on MY dime !" .
(he hadd several days ago chastised the financial institutions that had contributed to the mess and had guessed correctly that it'll be mostly the taxpayers who'll be footing the bill to try and keep some of the financial institutions from sinking - seems that he was right) .
hbg
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Nov, 2007 04:32 pm
If Bush's prognostications about the US economy next year is anything like his prognostications about Iraq; we're in big doodle.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 04:41 pm
au1929 wrote:
White House economic forecast more optimistic than others

International Herald Tribune, The Associated PressPublished: November 29, 2007






WASHINGTON: The White House issued an economic forecast Thursday that called for "solid growth" through next year, a prediction more optimistic than that of the Federal Reserve and far more optimistic than those of many analysts on Wall Street.

The administration predicted that the U.S. economy would expand by 2.7 percent in 2008, that unemployment would remain below 5 percent and that the outlook would be even better in 2009.

By contrast, Fed officials are predicting "subpar" growth through next year, starting with a sharp slowdown over the next six months. The "central tendency" of forecasts by Fed policy makers is for growth to slow to between 1.8 percent and 2.5 percent next year.

The White House was closer to the central bank on its estimate about unemployment, predicting that it would average 4.9 percent next year - up only slightly from 4.7 percent. But many analysts think the central bank's unemployment forecast is itself too optimistic, because it is inconsistent with its forecast for slower growth.

The White House forecast came after government data issued Thursday showed that U.S. home prices had marked a quarterly decline for the first time in 13 years. Home prices slipped 0.4 percent nationwide in the July-September period, compared with the previous quarter, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight said


There is none so blind as one who will not see.


What's there to see? Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Dec, 2007 05:44 pm
Worsening Credit Crisis Leading to Meltdown of Financial System and Severe US Recession
Stock-Markets / Credit Crunch
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article2875.html

The Economic Consequences of Mr. Bush
The next president will have to deal with yet another crippling legacy of George W. Bush: the economy. A Nobel laureate, Joseph E. Stiglitz, sees a generation-long struggle to recoup.
by
Joseph E. Stiglitz
December

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/12/bush200712
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Dec, 2007 10:41 am
The situation may be even more dire. Recent work by Susan Houseman concludes that US statistical data systems, which were set in place prior to the development of offshoring, are counting some foreign production as part of US productivity and GDP growth, thus overstating the actual performance of the US economy.

The falling dollar has pushed oil to $100 a barrel, which in turn will drive up other prices. The falling dollar means that the imports and offshored production on which Americans are dependent will rise in price. This is not a formula to produce a rise in US real incomes.

In the 21st century, the US economy has been driven by consumers going deeper in debt. Consumption fueled by increases in indebtedness received its greatest boost from Fed chairman Alan Greenspan's low interest rate policy. Greenspan covered up the adverse effects of offshoring on the US economy by engineering a housing boom. The boom created employment in construction and financial firms and pushed up home prices, thus creating equity for consumers to spend to keep consumer demand growing.

This source of US economic growth is exhausted and imploding. The full consequences of the housing bust remain to be realized. American consumers lack discretionary income and can pay higher taxes only by reducing their consumption. The service industries, which have provided the only source of new jobs in the 21st century, are already experiencing falling demand. A tax increase would cause widespread distress.

As John Maynard Keynes and his followers made clear, a tax increase on a recessionary economy is a recipe for falling tax revenues as well as economic hardship.

Superpower America is a ship of fools in denial of their plight. While offshoring kills American economic prospects, "free market economists" sing its praises. While war imposes enormous costs on a bankrupt country, neoconservatives call for more war, and Republicans and Democrats appropriate war funds which can only be obtained by borrowing abroad.
http://www.vdare.com/roberts/071127_destruction.htm
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Dec, 2007 10:58 am
Rama, That's the reason I'm against the feds cutting short-term interest rates now; it only exacerbates borrowing by consuners already in debt, and peanlizes those who have savings. More debt and less savings is the wrong formula for today's economy. We're already drowning in debt; more only makes things worse for everybody.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Dec, 2007 12:38 pm
And what about the mortgage mess? Should the Gov solve the mess, others have made for themselves?

Why not face the reality that some individuals should be home owners while others should just be renters?
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Dec, 2007 12:46 pm
Miller wrote:
And what about the mortgage mess? Should the Gov solve the mess, others have made for themselves?


No the government should but out of this.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Dec, 2007 12:50 pm
I agree; the government should not be bailing out those folks, both investors and buyers, who made bad financial decisions.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Dec, 2007 04:09 pm
Americans are very pessimistic when asked about the likelihood that a variety of specific economic events will occur over the next year. Americans believe that the United States will move into a recession; that grocery prices, out-of-pocket healthcare costs, and gas prices will go up; that unemployment will rise; and that housing prices will go down. These findings are in line with other recent Gallup data showing that almost 8 out of 10 Americans believe the U.S. economy is getting worse rather than better.

The new data -- from Gallup's nationally representative telephone panel survey, conducted Nov. 26-29 -- show that from 53% to 90% of Americans believe that each of the seven events tested, all of which most observers would likely view as negative, will definitely or probably happen over the next 12 months.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/103108/Americans-Predict-Recession-Price-Increases.aspx
Poll is not the main yardstick to assess the economic development i.
But it can give a vague idea about the future .
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 10:16 am
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The States Need Help - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fiscal Cliff - Question by JPB
Let GM go Bankrupt - Discussion by Woiyo9
Sovereign debt - Question by JohnJD
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 07/13/2025 at 06:50:24