114
   

Where is the US economy headed?

 
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Sep, 2013 10:53 am
By the way, just how happy are those Canadian women who are permitted to receive mammograms once every 3 years, while in the USA, women under the age of40 yr can get a mammogram once every 6 months, and those over 40 can receiver a free mammogram every year.

If you , as a woman found a lump in your breast would you want to wait 3 years to get a mammogram ? No American woman would wait 3 years, they'd rush in and get an immediate scan.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Sep, 2013 10:55 am
@Advocate,
I dont need to give Obamacare a chance because it does not deal with the reasons our care is so expensive, too much profit taking by inefficient providers who provide way too many services. you cant fix our cost problem without rationing care.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Sep, 2013 11:21 am
@Miller,
On mammograms and breast cancer in Canada.
http://www.cmaj.ca/content/183/17/1991
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Sep, 2013 12:28 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

On mammograms and breast cancer in Canada.
http://www.cmaj.ca/content/183/17/1991

on the other hand there was a big recent study that says that the US does way more mammograms than makes any sense.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Sep, 2013 12:30 pm
@hawkeye10,
I believe that is true - to a fault. It's not only mammograms, however.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Sep, 2013 06:29 pm
the state has reported that in the last year my county has added 100 (.1%) jobs.

That aint going to cut it.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Sep, 2013 08:14 pm
@hawkeye10,
It's going to be a very slow process, because many state (even local) governments have been running deficits, and can't pay off their debt. Adding workers to their budgets will only delay paying off their debts. Most governments have pension debts that can't be sustained at current levels.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Sep, 2013 08:29 pm
@cicerone imposter,
our county numbers are even worse than they look, we have been cutting good paying government jobs and adding low paying service jobs.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Sep, 2013 09:24 pm
@hawkeye10,
That's common in this country as well as most of Europe.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Oct, 2013 05:17 pm
A doctor told me a long time ago that the number of mammograms we as a nation perform are unnecessary. He told me not to bother. I was just asked to book for another appt and I really don't want to do one annually.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Oct, 2013 05:20 pm
@plainoldme,
I believe age is important as to when a mammogram makes sense. Older = more.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Oct, 2013 05:20 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
we have been cutting good paying government jobs and adding low paying service jobs.


Could be that is necessary hawk.
0 Replies
 
adammiller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Oct, 2013 07:27 am
@au1929,
It is really very hard time for US economy, Shutdown is going on and it affects badly to the country.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Thu 3 Oct, 2013 10:08 am
@adammiller,
Those in congress don't give a **** how much it hurts many families. They prefer trying to make their point about Obamacare that's already the law of the land to stop this country from functioning.

They were voted in by the people of this country. We have found the enemy......
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Oct, 2013 11:07 am
@cicerone imposter,
What took you so long?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Oct, 2013 12:17 pm
Just a few words of wisdom. Don't react to the politics in Washington the past few days to change your long-term investment plans. Keep well informed of what's happening, and plan accordingly, but don't make drastic decisions based on what we "know now." It's not enough to provide the necessary decision making changes to our long-term retirement plans. Make decisions in increments, not wholesale changes.

Most investors are ahead this year to take some decrease without impacting our holdings. My wife and I are ahead by over 11% this year. A few percentage drop doesn't mean much. Keep informed.
0 Replies
 
Bentinie
 
  2  
Reply Thu 3 Oct, 2013 12:36 pm
@plainoldme,
Quote:
A doctor told me a long time ago that the number of mammograms we as a nation perform are unnecessary. He told me not to bother. I was just asked to book for another appt and I really don't want to do one annually.


If there is a family history of breast cancer , then it makes sense to have annual checkups, and the earlier the better. I've read that each mammogram checkup exposes one to a certain level of radiation which accumulates over times. Conflicting schools of thought on when to begin getting annual mammograms can leave women slightly confused. Some doctors and organizations recommend that women start screenings at age 40 while others say it is safe to wait until age 50. There is no right answer. Each woman should evaluate her personal situation and decide when to begin mammograms.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Oct, 2013 12:59 pm
@Bentinie,
So true; it depends on many variables including family history, incidence of cancer in the community/area of residence, diet, and other health issues.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Feb, 2014 02:07 pm
Quote:
Like its fading rival, Kohl's is struggling to overcome a persistently sluggish economy, and people are finally waking up to it not being as strong as previously thought: high unemployment, a lack of new-jobs creation, real disposable income plunging the most in 40 years, median household incomes falling for five straight years, total consumer debt now 22% higher than it was three years ago, and student loan debt 61% higher.

Needless to say, the middle class is getting slaughtered, and these are hardly conditions conducive to recovery. Mid-tier retailers like Kohl's and Penney are being taken down with them.

Yet Kohl's is laying a lot of blame for the poor quarter on January store traffic. Without enough clearance merchandise to put out on sale, customers failed to show up as expected, which compounded problems it apparently experienced with its new e-commerce site that caused it to have higher-than-expected expenses. Full-year earnings are now anticipated to come in at $4.03 per share, compared to its previous forecast of $4.08 to $4.23 per share.

The retail landscape is desolate. J.C. Penney was going up against some of the easiest comps in its history and managed to just squeak out a 2% increase for the quarter and a mere 3% rise for the two-month holiday period. Best Buy reported a near-3% drop for the nine-week period, while Sears Holdings comps were down a whopping 9%. Others including Wal-Mart warned of a slow quarter with lower same-store sales expected, RadioShack will be shuttering 500 stores, and even the more financially fit Macy's will be implementing a similar store-closing strategy, albeit on a smaller scale (and its comps for the period were 4% higher).

I've been warning investors for months to stay away from retailers because it was clear early on that their numbers were going to come in much worse than expected, and now the shoes are dropping all over the sector.

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/02/08/kohls-is-starting-to-make-jc-penney-look-good.aspx

The disaster that is retailing has been a constant subject of discussion here at A2K, but the experts are finally catching on.

JCP is dead company wallking

SEARS/KMART is shedding costs and assets to keep the dollars flowing short term to stock and bond holders but the business is a disaster and they are not lifting a finger to improve things. A couple more years of this and there will be no way to save either brand, they will all close.

Kohl's is a horribly run company, and unless they get their act together it is hard to see how there is room in the newly smaller retail pie for them.

RADIO SHACK is on their third or fourth attempt at rebranding, which has never worked and probably will not work now, they are almost certainly done.

BEST BUY might be able to figure out a way to go forwards, but CHRISTMAS sucked.
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Feb, 2014 06:58 pm
First, Hawkeye, thanks for breathing life into this thread.
I am a retailer and also know enough about economics to be a bit dangerous.
There are numerous reasons why the sector is hurting.
As I recall you are in the restaurant business. What saddens me is that it seems like every new eatery that opens is a chain. Faux Italian, Indian or whatever.
Why is that?
 

Related Topics

The States Need Help - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fiscal Cliff - Question by JPB
Let GM go Bankrupt - Discussion by Woiyo9
Sovereign debt - Question by JohnJD
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.23 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 04:41:28