twyvel
It is bad to be one "against" two very bright "opposers". You and Nobody. It is not a matter of knowing who wins. It's a matter of time: I can only answer to one of you.
When I talk about the being I am talking about me. We can see "being" in two ways: "to be" and "the Being" - in german "zu sein" und "Das Sein".
I am in my experience. I see a sole (the fish) and I experience it as something very good to eat (I like fish and specially sole
). What makes me to have that kind of experience is my being. When I remember the sole I ate last week, I am Val-the-object, a given thing like the sole. But what made Val experience the sole as something very, very good to eat is the Sein - the Being of Val.
The problem is that when I say this, I loose the being of Val, and only remains the Val that is typing in his keyboard.
The portuguese poet Mário de Sá-Carneiro wrote (Sorry for the translation):
"I am not me or the other.
I am the bridge
between me and the other".
When we think of ourselves, we think about objects. When I say: I am using this keyboard, I am sick, I am talking about someone I can describe. But I am using this keyboard. And
I am sick.
Do you see what I mean? I see myself in the experience, but I am in the experience. The myself is the way my being manifests in the world.
AND, THIS IS FOR JL NOBODY
Please respect an older man, 48 years old with a huge influenza and fiever.
I AM NOT AN EXISTENCIALIST, I DON'T LIKE EXISTENCIALISM, AND IF EXISTENTIALISTS USED SOME OF HEIDEGGER'S CONCEPTS THAT'S THEIR PROBLEM.
DO YOU KNOW WHAT HEIDEGGER SAID WHEN HE SAW SARTRE'S "L'être et le néant"? "THIS IS A PIECE OF ****".
Now, I am going to bed and take my medicine
