The nuclear atom does NOT exist.

I've got $10,000 looking for an investment. I know it's not much (probably not nearly as much as you've invested yourself, considering you've known about this longer) but I could probably partner up with a bunch of my friends.

Who would we send our money to help this research area?

Quote:

I don't understand why you are so Old and Grumpy...you've been sitting on a POT OF GOLD for however long you've known about this.

I'd be Old and HAPPY-AS-****

What exactly do you mean here?

I mean you've stumbled across a new way to conceive of the world of physics. And it sounds like it's the ONLY TRUE way to conceive this world.

The possibilities here are endless. Think of all the problems you could solve. Think of what is possible and how much people would be willing to pay for it!

You're sitting on a gold mind.

How much money have you invested? How can I join in?!

Seems like you don't understand how the world works.

What you're saying would be worth Billions and make whomever monetizes it the richest person in the world...by far.

Can you think of the politicians who were involved in helping bring this to light? They'd go down as the greatest president/whatever in history.

Controversial writers in the sciences are two a penny. Most of them are just self publicists who are ignorant of the vast body of literature surrounding ontology (existence), epistemology (knowlege) and the status of scientific models.

Your simplistic level of dialogue here has nothing to do with physics or that body of knowledge surrounding its progress. Its just about looking for somebody to talk to. You are just one of a list of trolls who try their luck on this lenient forum, many of whom have been banned elsewhere.

Dewey Bernard Larson
Dewey Bernard Larson (1898-1990) was the creator of Reciprocal Theory, and an otherwise irrelevant American engineer. While he was writing only a few years before the Standard Model of physics came along to more fully refute his claims, he seems to very casually ignore how successful quantum mechanics has been in, among other things, explaining the physics of the electron and in providing fundamental explanations for essentially all of chemistry, even by the 1950s and 1960s. However, Larson still maintains a strong and passionate following among a few cranks who think that they've stumbled upon some great secret body of knowledge.

Oh dear...maybe you are one of those ego-trip writers....maybe you are a college drop-out on a self validation mission... Who cares ?
Some of us have been on this forum long enough to spot baloney merchants for what they are. Lets see if you last as long as the last one.

OldGrumpy; all you've managed to do from my point of view is very poorly represent your position, provide zero compelling details about your world view, have insulted those of us who chose to reply to you, and have MADE ABSOLUTE SURE that I will never ever read that book.

Nice work?]

BTW Asimov's original interest in Larson whom he later dismissed as merely 'a creative thinker' should be sufficient indication of the book' s scientific worth.