@fresco,
Quote:No the issue is whether you are too inflexible to understand that 'realism' is a straw man. All that matters as far as theoretical models are concerned is functionality with respect to confidence in their predictiveness, and coherence with respect to goodness of fit with other models. Both of these aspects are subject to constant revision and limiting as new observational domains are opened up by them for human observers. Only a simpleton or one addicted to the psychological comforts of religion believes in 'absolute truths'. Which one are you ?
Errrrr religion???? I am not into any religion. where the hell
did you ccome up with that?
You make it way too complex. The ONLY thing that I am saying here that there is really no nuclear atom, it is impossible, hence all the theories build on it are very wrong of course.
Is that too difficult for you to wrap your brain around?