@livinglava,
Quote:I'm calling you a liar for claiming to be interested in truth and then playing these kinds of posturing games.
That is so far fetched that not even the dumbest of the dumb person would ever attempt it.
You have never once actually addressed any of the science wrt 9/11.
You have never once offered any evidence for the USG official conspiracy theory.
You have never once addressed any of the factual issues surrounding 9/11.
You have make a huge pretense of being candid but the things you raised were so totally fatuous, so totally aimed at distractions and diversions and you have the unmitigated gall to question my interest in the truth.
118 fireman gave sworn testimony that they heard and felt explosions. Are you calling NYC firefighters liars?
Are you calling the NYT's reporter James Glantz a liar?
Quote:New York Times journalist James Glanz, writing near the end of 2001 about the collapse of WTC 7, reported that some engineers said that a “combination of an uncontrolled fire and the structural damage might have been able to bring the building down,” but that this “would not explain,” according to Dr. Barnett, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures.”
http://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-6/
Are you calling Biederman, Sissons and Barnett of FEMA liars? They are all in the video, below describing the WTC7 molten/vaporized steel.
Why aren't you calling John Gross of NIST a liar? He too is in the video and his lies are all exposed by the experts who followed.
It's all in this 5 minute 35 second video below. Which you have been given before. Such stark reality, and you have constantly, repeatedly, ignorantly ignored it all.
There are numerous scientists, architects, engineers in that video that illustrate that you are a liar by omission, a liar by deception, a liar by diversions and distraction, in short, an outright liar.
Molten Steel And NIST Lies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bv95zzBh18