Liberals - Practice Conservative Argument Techniques

VIGUERIE: That's what journalism is. It's just all opinion. Just opinion.

Baldimo wrote:

Lash wrote:

Wooo-hoo!!!

Hell. Sounds like I wrote it.

Blacks, used and excused. Now, GOP enthused!!!

Have any of you noticed that the areas with the largest concentrations of black people are Dem controlled and have been for year? The funny thing is that they haven't done anything to help the people of these cities. Instead they blame the Rep for the problems of the black man and continue to keep them in mental segregation. The use of the term "African-American" is meant to place black people at a distance of being real Americans. If this wasn't so then why does everyone insist on using the term? Very very very few blacks today are African anymore. They are about as African as I am Italian and I'm sure I much closer to being a descendent of my heritage then they are, and I would never call myself anything other then an American. Can't we drop the hyphen and just consider everyone American? I don't think the Dems will allow that to happen especially the "black leadership" of today. People like Farrakhan, Jackson and Sharpton want to be special and want to keep a level of segregation alive, it keeps them in business.

Bald racism. For real here. I would be ashamed to show my face in public after such a bold face racist set of remarks. For shame.

And they accuse others of being racist. It's mind-boggling.

Cycloptichorn

Someone who believes that race should not be a factor .... is a racist?

Quote:

VIGUERIE: That's what journalism is. It's just all opinion. Just opinion.

This is what they are trying to do to our country; turn everything into an argument of 'opinions' and take away the ability to hold politicians accountable to the facts.

The other day I heard Coulter say 'I don't agree with your characterization of the facts.' A convenient way to dodge a tough argument.

Cycloptichorn

I can't tell if either one of your are being serious. Lola is intentionally being obtuse; Cyclops is being dead serious, though, I believe. If either of you truly believe Baldimo's post constitutes a "bold face racist set of remarks," you really need to explain what you believe a "racist" remark to be. Because Baldimo has articulated a position that would stop making race a factor in personal dealings with one another.

It appears, then that you you believe someone who opposes Affirmative Action on the basis that it fosters a culture of separating people on the basis of their race, is a racist? Someone who believes that race should not be a factor .... is a racist?

Quit whining, Tico.

This is sort of funny. It makes us all seem stupid to even open our mouths.

Ah, politics...Gotta love it.

Quote:

I can't tell if either one of your are being serious. Lola is intentionally being obtuse; Cyclops is being dead serious, though, I believe. If either of you truly believe Baldimo's post constitutes a "bold face racist set of remarks," you really need to explain what you believe a "racist" remark to be. Because Baldimo has articulated a position that would stop making race a factor in personal dealings with one another.

It appears, then that you you believe someone who opposes Affirmative Action on the basis that it fosters a culture of separating people on the basis of their race, is a racist? Someone who believes that race should not be a factor .... is a racist?

There you go again. You can't get racism out of your mind. What is your deal with racism all the time?

FreeDuck wrote:

Quit whining, Tico.

You're trying to bait me, aren't you FD? I'm onto your little scheme, I'll have you know.

Ticomaya wrote:

Someone who believes that race should not be a factor .... is a racist?

That exact argument was made in our provincial legislature earlier this week. It's been fascinating to watch that play out.

What do you expect from a bunch of racist facists, Lola? Rationality? C'mon, they're not even capable of it.

/practicing

Cycloptichorn

Okay, Lola. You're being obtuse .. but that doesn't answer for Cyclops.

Lola wrote:

Quote:

I can't tell if either one of your are being serious. Lola is intentionally being obtuse; Cyclops is being dead serious, though, I believe. If either of you truly believe Baldimo's post constitutes a "bold face racist set of remarks," you really need to explain what you believe a "racist" remark to be. Because Baldimo has articulated a position that would stop making race a factor in personal dealings with one another.

It appears, then that you you believe someone who opposes Affirmative Action on the basis that it fosters a culture of separating people on the basis of their race, is a racist? Someone who believes that race should not be a factor .... is a racist?

There you go again. You can't get racism out of your mind. What is your deal with racism all the time?

Okay, Lola. You're being obtuse .. but that doesn't answer for Cyclops.

Quote:

Okay, Lola. You're being obtuse .. but that doesn't answer for Cyclops.

I don't have to answer anything to you, Facist!

Why don't you go back to your group of caucasians and have a discussion about how non-racist you are while you support debtor's prison and other UnAmerican concepts such as that.

Cycloptichorn

Quote:

Okay, Lola. You're being obtuse .. but that doesn't answer for Cyclops.

I don't have to answer anything to you, Facist!

Why don't you go back to your group of caucasians and have a discussion about how non-racist you are while you support debtor's prison and other UnAmerican concepts such as that.

Cycloptichorn