68
   

Global Warming...New Report...and it ain't happy news

 
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 22 Oct, 2020 10:37 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:
glitterbag wrote:
By the way, Estes Park is a National Park...that means it is managed by Donald Trump. You remember Donald right?

LOL! You're almost as ignorant as Farmerman.
Almost.

For the record, Estes Park is NOT a national park.

Estes Park is not any kind of park at all.

Estes Park is a town that is nestled in a valley up in the Rocky Mountains.

It seems likely that they will soon have cause to regret the left's mismanagement of their local forests.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Oct, 2020 11:33 pm
@oralloy,
The national park is called "Rocky Mountain National Park"- the location of the headquarters for Rocky Mountain National Park is in the town Estes Park.
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 04:32 am
@Walter Hinteler,
I 'm always amused when Ollie exposes his own limitations.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 04:51 am
@oralloy,
As usual, none of what you post is true.
Below viewing threshold (view)
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 04:54 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
I 'm always amused when Ollie exposes his own limitations.

Try again dummy. I'm not the one who said that Estes Park was a national park.
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 05:30 am
@oralloy,
BUT ITS THE PARK HQ, you missed that??? YA know, theres no dishonor to **** up, what is really kinda sad is when yo deny facts, insist on your own veritude, and , by so doing, furthr expose yourself like a "mini- me" Trump.
He doesnt admit when hes fucked up either so he always looks like a complete lying moron. Youre well in his league .

hightor
 
  4  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 05:48 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
phony

Quote:
dummy


Name-calling? Don't you always complain that others are doing that to you?

Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 06:21 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
Name-calling? Don't you always complain that others are doing that to you?

That 15 minute edit window isn't long enough for people to come back and add afterthoughts.

I'd much prefer it if he did not spout name-calling.

But so long as he does, I'm not going to just sit there and take it without responding.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 06:32 am
@oralloy,
Nonsense. The cite from CPR shows you're wrong about forests. As you are about most things you post.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 06:37 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Nonsense. The cite from CPR shows you're wrong about forests.

That is unlikely. Produce the allegedly untrue claim of mine, and a credible cite that shows it is untrue.


MontereyJack wrote:
As you are about most things you post.

You have a big mouth, but your're a phony and you cannot produce these supposedly untrue statements of mine.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 06:37 am
@oralloy,
oralloy says:
Quote:

You cannot provide any examples of me ever denying any facts


Nonsense. You deny tens of thousands of FACTS about climate. You deny the results of thousands of researchers' research.
oralloy
 
  -4  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 06:38 am
@MontereyJack,
It is proper that unreliable claims are disregarded.

What is improper is you referring to unreliable claims as facts.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 06:41 am
@oralloy,
Just did. Stop with the phony ****.
oralloy
 
  -4  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 06:46 am
@MontereyJack,
So long as you make untrue claims about me and don't even try to back them up, it is proper to point out that you are a phony.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 06:50 am
@oralloy,
I backed them up. You know nothing about the field but what you read from denialists, so you keep talking nonsense about it.
oralloy
 
  -4  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 06:52 am
@MontereyJack,
Wrong again. You have not backed up any of your claims.

And this is another claim that you will never back up. You cannot provide any examples of me talking nonsense about anything.

You also cannot provide any evidence that I read anything from any denialists.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2020 07:00 am
@oralloy,
Your posts prove you have no knowledge of what you're talking about, just totally biased and hopelessly hyper-partisan conjecture.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/03/2020 at 10:07:30