72
   

Global Warming...New Report...and it ain't happy news

 
 
High Seas
 
  0  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2010 07:38 am
@MontereyJack,
Sorry, Jack, I actually work in China for much of the year and am about to go back in a few days so I know their government's position - it's against pollution. Not a moment too soon since their inland and coastal waters have been turned into hopelessly toxic sewers and their - unique in the world - river dolphins are now extinct. The allegedly clean-burning-coal plants account for how much of electricity generated in China? Try zero, as in 00.00. These plants cost a helluvalot and that's before factoring in indirect costs - or externalities. Look up the actual sources of power generation, not the PR.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  0  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2010 07:39 am
H20boy,Santa Claus has the thermostat in his workshop at the North Pole (he's had to install pontoons to hold the workshop up, since global warming is melting the ice out from underneath him). Dumb question, H2O
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2010 07:43 am
High Seas says:
Quote:
so I know their government's position - it's against pollution
Yes, of course, that's ONE of their reasons for doing it. It is not their only one. They have many, which all reinforce each other. They are also, as I said, worried about the effect of climate change. And they see a golden oportunity for developing the next generation of technology to combat it, which the West is shamefully not exploiting
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2010 07:44 am
@MontereyJack,
Just how much of that is due to people ?
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2010 07:45 am
ionus, uh, how much of what? too many topics going on here at once, what are you referring to?
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2010 07:49 am
@MontereyJack,
Click on your psuedonom above my post. It was in response to your list of disasters created by God.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2010 07:50 am
HS, they have a commercial-scale plant up and running. We haven't even any proof-of-concept plants. They built traditional dirty plants because they were quick and cheap, but the reports are that economies of scale make new generation plants cheaper and those are the ones on the planning tables now.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2010 07:53 am
ionus, hm, interesting, didn't know clicking on it did that. Live and learn. Very little--comet collisions? Nah. Mass extinctions? Nah. Bubonic plague? Nah. Those are all the big guy.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2010 07:54 am
Interesting tho this is, my sleep schedule has gotten all screwed up again.. It's 8:50 AM here and I've been up all night and I am going to sleep. Carry on.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2010 07:55 am
Ms. Jack has joined the cult and Ms. Jack is drinking the blue Kool-Aid.

Poor little girl has her panties in such a wad.
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2010 08:02 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:

... the reports are that economies of scale make new generation plants cheaper and those are the ones on the planning tables now.

Who do you think writes those reports? Who do you think implements the "planning" you get to hear about? Why do you think these people employ western professionals at all - having plenty of their own experts? Well I speak for no engineering, only for finances, and suggest you could do worse than look into the actual numbers before you venture into any more categorical statements like these. The only sustainable financial numbers are those for nuclear plants - and it's no accident the Chinese have managed to corner the Australian and African uranium supplies - and they don't have the problem we do, idiot "environmentalist" ignoramuses blocking construction of new nuclear plants, or the short-sightedness we exhibit in turning down projects with high front-end costs because the financing won't work out. Read what you post - China has one (ONE) clean-coal plant?! True. Think about it.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  0  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2010 12:53 pm
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/global-jan-dec-error-bar-pg.gif
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/global-jan-dec-error-bar-pg.gif
Jan-Dec Global Mean Temperature over Land & Ocean
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/nhshgl.gif
Average Annual Global Temperature 1850-2010
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/nhshgl.gif
Average Annual Global Temperature 1850-2010
http://www.biocab.org/Solar_Irradiance_English.jpg
http://www.biocab.org/Solar_Irradiance_English.jpg
Solar Irradiance 1611 t0 2001

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Mauna_Loa_Carbon_Dioxide.png
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Mauna_Loa_Carbon_Dioxide.png
CO2 Density Trend 1958-2008
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Nov, 2010 02:46 pm
@ican711nm,
THE AVERAGE AND MEAN ANNUAL GLOBAL TEMPERATURES INCREASED ABOUT 1°C (1.8°F) IN THE LAST 100 YEARS.
Quote:

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=f80a6386-802a-23ad-40c8-3c63dc2d02cb
As of December 20, 2007, more than 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries have voiced significant objections to major aspects of the alleged
403
Meteorologist Thomas B. Gray is the former head of the Space Services branch at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and a researcher in NOAA’s Space Environment Laboratory and Environmental Research Laboratories. Gray also served as an aviation meteorologist for the United States Air Force. Gray asserted that “climate change is a natural occurrence” and dissented from the view that mankind faces a “climate crisis” in 2007. “I was awarded my MS in meteorology from Florida State University and I became interested in paleoclimatology,” Gray wrote to EPW on December 25, 2007. “Nothing that is occurring in weather or in climate research at this time can be shown to be abnormal in the light of our knowledge of climate variations over geologic time,” Gray explained. “I am sure that the concept of a ‘Global Temperature’ is nonsense,” he added. “The claims of those convinced that AGW (anthropogenic global warming) is real and dangerous are not supported by reliable data,” Gray concluded.

0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Nov, 2010 08:34 pm
I see Obama is not walking the walk with any energy saving transportation! Instead, he has an 8 ton diesel limousine to drive him around.
http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/obamas-beast-limo-creates-stir-at-nato-green-summit/19727153?test=latestnews
"Obama's 'Beast' Creates Stir at NATO Green Summit"
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Nov, 2010 02:21 am
@okie,
It seems they want the poor to save the earth, they are too busy enjoying the here and now.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Nov, 2010 03:02 am
@okie,
Fortunately, all other US-Americans are driving small cars with very low energy consumption.
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  2  
Reply Sat 27 Nov, 2010 09:30 pm
Quote:
Another Top International Scientist Jumps off Global Warming ‘Titanic’
I dont think many will go down with the ship. They tried to reign in consumer madness with lies and it didnt work.

They are comparing the temp of the earth during an Ice Age from ice samples and declaring the planet is warmer after the ice has melted. ???? Where are the ice samples from after the ice has melted to do a comparison ? Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Deckland
 
  2  
Reply Sun 28 Nov, 2010 12:12 pm
Quote:
UK shivers in record low temperatures
PARTS of Britain have experienced record low temperatures, including minus 17 Celsius in Wales, forecasters say, amid warnings of more heavy snow to come.

A sure sign of man made global warming.
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Nov, 2010 05:38 pm
@Deckland,
Quote:
UK shivers in record low temperatures
And last summer we had snow in Oz. There are no end of anomalies to be discounted when you already know the result you want.

Interesting attitude they have.....
If it gets hotter it is due to GW
If it gets colder it is due to GW

A km of ice over Europe, North America, Asia....what would that do to the popuation and wildlife compared to the Earth getting a little hotter ?
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Nov, 2010 06:04 pm
@Ionus,
Yes..quite evident and plausible as the weather extremes are reached due to global warming. Whether or not global warming is man-made or nature is the debatable issue.

I have no idea how some weather phenomenons can be SCIENTIFICALLY (or otherwise)attibutable to man vs natural causation.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 02/06/2025 at 05:02:50