Global Warming...New Report...and it ain't happy news

Quote:

Please present your evidence, or stop making claims for which you have no supporting evidence.

It was presented.

Are we to think that the typical blindness that affects Global Warming Thuggees allows them to see facts ? You cant see it because you dont want to...you find it..it is there.

When has a natural glaciation occurred in a period as short as 500 years?

So you think that some meaningful change can be made in the earth's climate trend over a relatively short period of time, say 100 to 500 years?

You only have one eye so maybe you should look harder. I am not wasting my time chasing down things I have already researched

and presented because you cant see them. Ask parados. He argued vehemently the facts were wrong. Wouldnt he have had to have seen it to do that ? Just because you wander into this thread every now and then doesnt justify my time, one eyed horn.

You should understand that I am not your bro. If you cant find them, one eye, then I suggest that is typical of your attitude to Global Warming. If it disagrees with you, then you cant see it.
You are full of **** if you think people will believe you because you deny what I have presented as existing. If you are too lazy to go back and search for it, then stiff ! I put it on record and you are too stupid to find it. Until you can read with only one eye I am going to have to include that you are too incompetent for further discussion with and you should understand that I neither respect your opinion nor want to educate you.

[
As the one making the positive assertion, the burden of proof falls on you. I think that you are incorrect in both your assessment and your limited understanding of thermal dynamics and climatology.

Please present your evidence, or stop making claims for which you have no supporting evidence.

Cycloptichorn

Odd isn't it when later on Cyclo blandly asserts that because the imagined consequences of climate or environmental change are so great, we should necessarily "be conservative" and presumably destroy a large fraction of the world's economy in the process.

or of mankind's potential to significantly alter the dynamics of the earth's crust and atmosphere, which are already known to be volatile, dynamic and unpredictable. Indeed he doesn't even acknowledge the burden of proof which he so blithely lays on those who oppose him.

Quote:

So are you willing to argue that an increase in the high/low for a day in no way reflects an increase in temperature?

Thats right. An increase in a high and a low does not indicate a rise in temp.

Quote:

Are you also willing to argue that it is as likely for the average temperature to be lower as it is higher if the high/low is higher?

Yes it is just as possible.

You only have one eye so maybe you should look harder. I am not wasting my time chasing down things I have already researched and presented because you cant see them.

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport#report
355
Botanist Dr. David Bellamy, a famed UK environmental campaigner, former lecturer at Durham University, and host of a popular UK TV series on wildlife, recently converted into a skeptic after reviewing the science and now calls global warming fears "poppycock." According to a May 15, 2005 article in the UK Sunday Times, Bellamy said that "global warming is largely a natural phenomenon. The world is wasting stupendous amounts of money on trying to fix something that can't be fixed." "The climate-change people have no proof for their claims. They have computer models which do not prove anything," Bellamy added. Bellamy's conversion concerning global warming did not come without a sacrifice, as several environmental groups have ended their association with him because of his views on climate change. The severing of relations came despite Bellamy's long activism for green campaigns. The UK Times reported Bellamy "won respect from hard-line environmentalists with his campaigns to save Britain's peat bogs and other endangered habitats. In Tasmania he was arrested when he tried to prevent loggers cutting down a rainforest." On July 1, 2007, in an op-ed titled "THE GLOBAL WARMING MYTH," Bellamy called man-made catastrophic global warming promotion "a political football that has lost its foundations in real science." "There are no facts linking the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide with imminent catastrophic global warming, there are only predictions based on complex computer models," he explained. Bellamy turned his skepticism on Gore, asking "Why scare the families of the world with tales that polar bears are heading for extinction when there is good evidence that there are now twice as many of these iconic animals, most doing well in the Arctic than there were 20 years ago? Why cry wolf on a rise in the spread of malaria thanks to rising temperatures when this mosquito borne disease was a main killer of people throughout the Little Ice Age in Britain and northern Russia?" (LINK)

How is it "just as possible" for the winter day to be warmer than the summer day?

Make it interesting. If I support it, you will apologise and leave this thread. Too gutless ? All mouth and no back bone, one eye ?

Explain how a winter day that has a low of -6 and a high of -2 can be warmer than a summer day that has a low of 16 and a high of 22.

Your predilection for insult makes you weaker, not stronger. I wonder if you understand that most here see right through it. A pattern of doing so is the mark of a poor debater, not a strong one.