Ican wrote
Quote:Debating either type can be fun as long as one does not take them too seriously.
Concurring with your other points in the post I took this one from, I think I'm getting a lot better at not taking things seriously. I had never experienced the kinds of self-righteous, personally directed judgment directed at people as we see from some on the left here on A2K, and I did feel hurt, especially when people I wanted to be friends with made it quite clear they were having none of that. I have not experienced any of that from some pretty ultra liberal friends and relatives I have in the real world.
I've toughened up though and can take your advice to not take it too seriously. Sometimes I leave a thread that becomes so assininely (is that a word?) stupid and nothing of substance is being discussed. I reserve the right to an opinion that some here do work especially hard at being obtuse.
Anyhow, so far as AGW is concerned, I continue to keep an open mind and will go with the most persuasive arguments as I have no way of verifying the truth of any of it for myself. To date, I think the skeptics have by far the most persuasive and compelling arguments and this is reinforced that most people with particular expertise in paleoclimatology seem to be skeptical that global warming is significantly human caused or that humans have the ability to stop it short of triggering a nuclear winter.
And using that to arrive at a logical deduction, I think we will be prudent to KNOW what forces are driving global warming and/or what ability, if any, we have to significantly affect that one way or the other before we agree to submit to mandates for extreme lifestyle changes, restrictions on personal freedoms, and/or costly measures that will accomplish little.
Further, if there is nothing we can reasonably do to effect changes in the global climate, another logical deduction is that we would be wise to focus our collective wisdom, intelligence, creativity, and resources on ways to help people to adjust to and improve on what we know to be irrefutable fact.