satt_fs wrote:A line is a conventional tool for analyzing a trend in statistical data with the Least Square Method (LSM).
Conventional or not: If the trend thus analyzed is not linear but periodical, fitting a straight line to it is inherently meaningless. And the least square method does in no way presuppose that the function fitted to the data be a line. All it does is measure how closely the function fits the data.
***
On re-reading, even the bit about "60 years" turns out to be dubious, judging by the way BBC is reporting it.
BBC wrote:The current rate of shrinkage they calculate at 8% per decade; at this rate there may be no ice at all during the summer of 2060.
This is an error in elementary arithmetics, no matter how charitably you interpret the quote. If you interpret it to say the cap is shrinking at a
rate of eight
percent a decade, its half-life will be 90 years, but it will
never vanish. If, as their linear fit is suggesting, they are saying the cap is shrinking
linearly at eight
percentage points per decade, it will vanish, but not in 60 years but in 125. This is not rocket science mathematics they're messing with here. It's the rule of three they have learned in elementary school. I don't know why they're not cross-checking their confident statement against this simple rule, but a good guess is that they found this bit of trivia too good to ruin it with research.