61
   

THE MEANING OF OZ - All you need to know!

 
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 02:48 am
And she said it twice! Very Happy

But I'm curious, margo, did this Swans victory mean anything at all to you, or anyone you know?
0 Replies
 
Mr Stillwater
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 02:59 am
Basically it means that the Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras as held in Melbourne is a sort of sporting event. Small shorts, big leaps, balls-out and 'Baxter's Rules'.....


Ohh... and the tram ride home.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 04:24 am
You have a point there, Mr S .... Compared to rugby union, Oz Rules footballers are taller, trimmer, fitter looking & yes, they have shorter, tighter shorts! Laughing

Question from an sports ignoramus: Is it an advantage to be short & stumpy in Rugby union? (I've always wondered.) :wink:
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 09:07 am
No neck seems to be a key attribute for union. Have a look next time you see the forward pack.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 10:16 pm
Yes, the necks, dadpad! (now that you mention it!) Laughing
It seems they need to be very thick & wide (& rather short, too! Shocked). But why is it so? Confused
0 Replies
 
margo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 10:33 pm
No, MsOlga
it didn't mean much to me - I'm just here to drive you batty!

As you know, I'm interested in a number of sports, some in more detail than others (and I know I don't look remotely the sporting type - before you say anything!)

I do occasionally watch the Swans. My father came from the Riverina district of NSW - where Aussie Rules is played, and he followed the local Sydney teams, in a sort of disinterested fashion. We lived just across the river from the Western Suburbs club at the time - and went to matches sporadically. So my grounding in Aussie Rules came early.

I watch the Swans for the reasons you mention - tall, fit men, tight shorts and great legs! And they're winners! And I quite like the game. I did watch the match on TV - but so did most of Sydney!

I also watch rugby union - but not rugby league - which seems to be the game for the most inarticulate oafs. Soccer - or football - hmmmm!!

But the cricket season is sneaking up, and then there's tennis..... <Be aware of a possible short invasion of Melbourne for the tennis!>
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Sep, 2005 10:57 pm
Rugby union & rugby league! Two very different kettles of fish, apparently? Confused See, I know NOTHING! Confused

Thanks for the Sydney Report, margo. Very Happy As you know, Melbourne is incredibly obsessed by Oz Rules. Sometimes ya gotta wonder what the rest of the country makes of it. We get so much self-serving spin from the "AFL supremos" Rolling Eyes about how fabulously the game is embraced in other states, sometimes you have to wonder .....

A possible January visit to Melbourne for the tennis, did you say? Oh good! Very Happy (Seeing you, margo, not the tennis, I mean! :wink: )
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 02:56 am
msolga wrote:
Yes, the necks, dadpad! (now that you mention it!) Laughing
It seems they need to be very thick & wide (& rather short, too! Shocked). But why is it so? Confused


Ever see a neanderthall exibit at the museum?
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 04:23 am
It is certainly linked to the development of early man. Australopithecene played a different game altogether. Over the years both the game an man have evolved. The long thin necked players were not best suited for those early scrummages, and died out.
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 04:30 am
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
It is certainly linked to the development of early man. Australopithecene played a different game altogether. Over the years both the game an man have evolved. The long thin necked players were not best suited for those early scrummages, and died out.


I prefer to think the Intelligent Coach pulled them off the field Very Happy
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 05:44 am
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
It is certainly linked to the development of early man. Australopithecene played a different game altogether. Over the years both the game an man have evolved. The long thin necked players were not best suited for those early scrummages, and died out.


Thank you, Steve. Mystery solved!
Long thin necks are still prevalent amongst Australian Rules footballers. Obviously they are less evolved.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 05:49 am
you're welcome olga

anything else you would like to know about?
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 05:53 am
Laughing

Not right this minute,thanks, Steve. But can I call on you the next time I need answers?
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 06:31 am
of course!

I'm working on some assorted answers right now.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 06:51 am
It pays to be pepared! Laughing
0 Replies
 
margo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Sep, 2005 09:24 pm
Laughing Rolling Eyes OH!
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Sep, 2005 12:48 am
msolga wrote:
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
It is certainly linked to the development of early man. Australopithecene played a different game altogether. Over the years both the game an man have evolved. The long thin necked players were not best suited for those early scrummages, and died out.


Thank you, Steve. Mystery solved!
Long thin necks are still prevalent amongst Australian Rules footballers. Obviously they are less evolved.


No msolga, they adapted...good Australian Rules footballers - well not rovers but ruckmen and forwards - tend to be good at basketball too Very Happy
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Sep, 2005 04:43 am
margo wrote:
Laughing Rolling Eyes OH!



OH?
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Sep, 2005 05:31 am
goodfielder wrote:
msolga wrote:
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
It is certainly linked to the development of early man. Australopithecene played a different game altogether. Over the years both the game an man have evolved. The long thin necked players were not best suited for those early scrummages, and died out.


Thank you, Steve. Mystery solved!
Long thin necks are still prevalent amongst Australian Rules footballers. Obviously they are less evolved.


No msolga, they adapted...good Australian Rules footballers - well not rovers but ruckmen and forwards - tend to be good at basketball too Very Happy


Ah, the flexible, multi-skilling model! Razz
Pity about the rovers, though! Razz
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Sep, 2005 05:32 am
goodfielder wrote:
msolga wrote:
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
It is certainly linked to the development of early man. Australopithecene played a different game altogether. Over the years both the game an man have evolved. The long thin necked players were not best suited for those early scrummages, and died out.


Thank you, Steve. Mystery solved!
Long thin necks are still prevalent amongst Australian Rules footballers. Obviously they are less evolved.


No msolga, they adapted...good Australian Rules footballers - well not rovers but ruckmen and forwards - tend to be good at basketball too Very Happy


Ah, the flexible, multi-skilling model!
Pity about the rovers, though! Razz
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Beached As Bro - Discussion by dadpad
Oz election thread #3 - Rudd's Labour - Discussion by msolga
Australian music - Discussion by Wilso
Oz Election Thread #6 - Abbott's LNP - Discussion by hingehead
AUstralian Philosophers - Discussion by dadpad
Australia voting system - Discussion by fbaezer
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 11:16:32