I think Glennn is correct when participants must hold their emotions against others and try to concentrate more in the topic in question.
able2know has lots of topics in which the discussion of the past world war can be discussed, like the forum of history.
The point I'm making about finding a "contradiction" is the only option given for the cat to die or keep alive in the thought experiment Schrödinger's Cat.
The dead or alive status is acceptable, because a stroke in the cat can cause part of its body not responding anymore but still is alive.
However, the poison gas is not the only cause for the cat to die. As I stated before, the cat died because a heart attack.
The cat can die by injuring itself with part of the mechanism inside and die because bleeding without stop.
Or, it can be alive because even when the poison gas was triggered, the system malfunctioned.
Then, expecting the cat dead or alive because the release or not releasing of the gas poison is a kind of contradictory status when there are several other causes which weren't included for the final status of the dead or survival of the cat.
There's no empirical evidence supporting those first two words of your post 'I think'.
This renders the rest of the post 'word salad' despite the pretty double line spacing.
I think... I mean... no doubt that your message has been motivated by emotion.
Until today, nobody found the contradictory error in the Schrödinger's Cat thought experiment when it assumed the gas poison as the only cause for the cat to die inside the box.
You should give me thanks and kiss my big toe like Democrats must do with our beloved president Trump because he liberated us from Mrs. Clinton, whom we now know she should be the worst president of the US by her weird reactions in front of aggressive environment.
I have discovered the fault in Schrödinger's Cat, and this discovery makes me be in a position over the whole theory itself.
So, don't hate me because I'm beautiful...
Sat 28 Oct, 2017 07:52 pm
The reason QM is deemed 'counter-intuitive' is that it departs from such classical logic.
I do not believe. It doesn't even make sense for something "to depart from classical logic." Just because Quantum Mechanics follows "quantum logic," doesn't mean Quantum Mechanics doesn't follow classical logic.
Your last post is clearly garbage since I have cited a quotation giving at least one specific aspect of the difference.
If others are prepared to waste their time playing talky games with you, that's their problem.
I read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_logic#Differences_with_classical_logic, which you previously quoted. If (p and q) or (p and r) = false, then p and (q or r) = false as well. The alleged incompatibility does not exist. The first paragraph of the entire Wikipedia article for which I linked a section suggests the inconsistency is only apparent, and may not be real. I do not believe it is real.
Of course you don't 'believe it'. You have built a whole edifice of self publicity based on a naive view that ' classical logic' is the foundation of semantics. Philosophers of language and psycholinguists, of whom you appear to have no knowledge, disagree with that. The naive realistic view, that 'things' exist independent of the acts of observation which evoke them, is indicated by that twaddle about 'unfound things' on your website. Sorry, but to a Brit like me, its a typical example of a 'full of himself Yank' with a limited education and an ego problem.
End of Message.
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 01:29 pm
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 01:37 pm
More, the notion of "embodied language":
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 02:14 pm
Frack I go for an hat trick:
Sun 29 Oct, 2017 02:22 pm
Now more seriously because pompous idiots deserve the full treat:
And so we see the lower boundary of resolution of detail. The location of her wings can be described as the volume they traversed, with a probability density function inversely proportional to the transparency visible in the photo.
In the same way we can describe chance events, such as the roll of a pair of dice. The dice will turn up box cars 1/36 of the time, so we can describe it as 1/36 boxcars.