Science Deniers are Everywhere

There is no reason that the US, the richest country in the world, ONLY because of its thieving nature, shouldn't take the lead and shouldn't "suffer" for its own sins. The US has long been one of the worst polluters.

That what he meant.

I'm not "harsh with the US" at all. You're a coward, terrified by the least criticism. What you should fear, is the judgement of your own kids, and grand kids. You guys have disinformed the whole world to make money. You sacrificed truth and future generations to short term gain. Your grand sons will pee on your graves.

Do you know what a "lie" is, Glenn? Are you aware of the concept of "lying"? If you don't know of the concept, I can explain. If you know about it, consider that everything you thought you knew about climate change -- including your BS "findings" -- is a lie, told to you by filthy rich people, so that they can remain filthy rich. You are a useful idiot to them.

Actually, the questions put to you were:

Can you provide the study that shows that the six-fold increase in hydrocarbon use since 1940 has had an effect on temperature trends . . . or not?

Do you have anything to refute these finding? Perhaps some studies that show that the information and graphs found at the link below are fraudulent?

http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p36.htm
___________________________________________

Do you know what a non answer is? Check the post above this one for a perfect example.

Two posts in a row illustrating your stunning hypocrisy, Olivier. It's often asked because there is so much lying and hypocrisy here, have you no shame?

If you're right they probably will. Obviously I'm not betting on that happening.

Says one of the biggest liars I have ever come across, a man who denies reality, who denies science with a vengeance that is only bettered by farmerman.

They will, Finn, for your unqualified support for the US government falsely accusing Muslims, Iraqis, Afghans, Osama bin Laden, alleged hijackers for something that was totally impossible for them to have done.

Science doesn't lie. Why do you science deniers keep on lying?

Why are you people still arguing with Camlok?

Why do you care?

Because I like you Finn. I don't want to see you wasting away your life like this. It never ends.

Thank you max, but I'm not arguing with him. Probably childish but I enjoy tweaking him, but then I used to poke the neighbor's mean dog with a stick through the fence.

That's a shocker.

But a great new signature line for the president of the Finn Fan Club.

The coward max shows his ooogly face. How is it going, Science Denier? Thomas sure spanked you good.

They aren't arguing, max, they are dithering. Trying to provide cover for multitudinous, evil US crimes.

Arguing means putting forth scientific precepts for others to consider. You've never done that so you need some coaching.

I recommend Glennn or Builder.

In the psychology of human behavior, denialism is a person's choice to deny reality, as a way to avoid a psychologically uncomfortable truth.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denialism
============

Max is a science denier but he is hardly the only one. The active science deniers are farmerman, olivier, max, oralloy, baldimo, McGentrix, ... ? .

They all fled rather than discuss the science.

The passive science deniers are almost everyone else who frequents A2K because they all know at least a little about 911 and yet they avoid it "as a way to avoid a psychologically uncomfortable truth".

Here are some of the stark realities that are being avoided:

1. Molten steel [2800F]/vaporized steel [4900+F], molten molybdenum [4700F], vaporized lead [3200F], molten iron microspheres [2700F]. It was impossible for putative high jackers to have caused these molten metals as jet fuel/office furnishing reach max 1800F.

2. Thermite found at WTC in all the dust, actually NANOTHERMITE, a new type of super explosive developed by US Lawrence Livermore Labs in the 1990s. No one else on the planet has access to nanothermite, no one else even knows how it is made, only the US and its scientists.

3. The nanothermite found in WTC dust is the thing that caused the iron microspheres, some 6% of WTC dust, normal office dust has less than 1%. Iron microspheres are the main by product of a thermitic reaction.

4. The jet that supposedly hit WTC2 was able to fly right thru two walls of 14" steel box columns, in and out of WTC2 without any damage to the nose, which is easily damaged by bird strikes. Or it was a missile/bunker buster?

5. The engine found on Murray St that was supposedly from the jet that hit WTC2, a 767-200, was not an engine that was used in the 767 series of planes.

6. There is no CCTV video of any of the alleged hijackers at any of the airports they are said to have departed from.

7. NIST, the government agency that did the studies of the twin towers and WCT7 repeatedly lied, they repeatedly denied absolute realities such as explosions heard by firemen, police, first responders, reporter, eyewitnesses, ... .

8. NIST denied the presence of explosives despite scientific proof of nanothermite, residues of nanothermite, molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, USGS and others.

9. The molten/vaporized steel is a complete impossibility if we were to follow the US government conspiracy theory. It could not happen in that scenario and yet it exists, as do many other examples of molten steel, molten concrete, fused steel and concrete.

10. George Bush described explosions and bombs in the twin towers, which firefighters had to endure in a March 2017 PEOPLE magazine interview.

These types of science denial are world class science denial, on a par with Holocaust Denial, Flat Earthers, ... .

The fact that your "findings" are fraudulent should be obvious to all. Most of the data provided in the paper is without sources, which is unscientific at the extreme. The lead author, Arthur Robinson, has a rather strange bio. Check him on wikipedia:

You are describing you, farmerman, max, McG, baldimo, ... .

Of course I am right. Global warming is already a reality.