What do libertarian republicans believe?

The Libertarian party doesn't have that much money, so I'm proud to have compiled the world's shortest platform summary of the party.

Fiscal policy: The Libertarian party opposes taxation in pretty much all forms, and it deals with the revenue loss by opposing entitlement programs in pretty much all forms. This means that people keep more of what they earn, but it also means that there is no social safety net. And ambitious new proposals – such as universal pre-kindergarten and universal health care – are obviously not compatible with this objective.

Corporations: The party would eliminate all federal subsidies to private corporations, as well as all antitrust laws.

Public services: The Libertarian party would like to eliminate the U.S.Postal Service. It wants to transfer all government services, from public schools to landfills, to private ownership

Property rights: The party would restrict public domain to immediate public use and sell or give away most public property to private owners.

Criminal justice: It would eliminate all anti-drug laws and legalize prostitution, as well as end random police roadblocks.

Free speech: The party would abolish the FCC and allow private ownership of broadcast frequencies. It opposes all restriction of free speech, including that in the name of national security.

Church and state: The Libertarian party calls for reduced IRS regulation and monitoring of tax-exempt churches.

The Second Amendment: The party strongly opposes all gun control, as well as regulation of alternative weapon technologies such as mace and Tasers.

The draft: It calls for the abolition of the Selective Service System and amnesty for any citizen who has ever resisted the draft.
Reproductive rights: The Libertarian party is pro-choice. It opposes all federal funding of abortion and most federal entitlements for women who choose to carry their pregnancies to term, including the child tax credit. it opposes involuntary or fraudulent sterilization.

LGBT rights: The party opposes the "don't ask, don't tell." doctrine. It believes that marriage is a private contract, and as such it should yield no government benefits regardless of the gender of the partners.
Immigrants' rights: The Libertarian party argues that borders should be open but surveilled. Everyone who does not pose a threat to public health or national security should be allowed to enter the country legally. It would deny all federal benefits to undocumented immigrants.

There is no such thing as a libertarian republican

A libertarian Republican is a politician or Republican party member who has advocated libertarian policies while typically voting for and being involved with the United States Republican Party.
Libertarian Republican - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_Republican

I call this a craptastic definition.

You are hardly an authority on the English language.

How is it different than a Tea Party Republican or an Evangelical Christian Republic, which are actual groupings found with the Republican Party?

"The Republican Party is divided into factions. In a 2014 Pew Research Center survey on political typology and polarization, 12% of Republicans described themselves as libertarian."[1]

C: You are hardly an authority on the English language.

B: Good thing for me I never claimed to be.

Libertarian is an actual political party that runs it's own candidates for elections.

Then we are in agreement that your reply was nonsense and there was no reason for you to have written it.

Quote:
Libertarian is an actual political party that runs it's own candidates for elections.


I'm aware of that. That doesn't change the fact that libertarian Republicans exist.

No agreement, it was craptastic definition that was filled with bias.

I would say they exist in the same place as republican democrats or democrat republicans. Maybe they are Republicans with libertarian leanings, less or no conservative stance on the social issues but conservative on the spending and tax issues.

First, in complete defiance of reality, you deny they exist, then in the following paragraph, quoted above, you describe your opinion of them and how they exist.

They exist, Baldimo!

This exchange clearly reveals you are a person who is only interested in diversion, not real discussion, Baldimo.

They exist. Libertarian Republicans exist.

You deny stark reality. Not just this one time. You are a study in denying stark reality.

You make up the wackiest diversions. You simply are not a person to be trusted. Is this your conservative Republican leanings?

Will you now deny the existence of conservative Republicans?

Libertarian Republican:
Beliefs and size[edit]
See also: Factions in the Republican Party (United States)
The Republican Party is divided into factions. In a 2014 Pew Research Center survey on political typology and polarization, 12% of Republicans described themselves as libertarian.[1] The libertarian branch of the party is smaller than other branches, including "Main Street" voters (pragmatic, establishment-supporting, open to more compromise), Tea Party voters (radical right-wing populists with "a deep mistrust of experts, elites and even the G.O.P. establishment"), and Christian conservatives (dominated by white evangelical voters, mostly from the South).[2] However, the libertarian bloc in the party is larger in size than several other groups, such as former Northeastern moderate Republicans (which have almost disappeared) and hawkish "national security" voters who favor neoconservativism.[2] Compared to other Republican factions, libertarian Republicans have relatively little party loyalty.[2]

According to a 2012 New York Times analysis, libertarian Republicans have a variety of motivating issues. On economic and domestic policy, they favor cutting taxes and regulations, repealing the Affordable Care Act, and protecting gun rights.[2] On social issues, they favor privacy and oppose the USA Patriot Act, support abortion rights, and oppose the War on Drugs.[2] On foreign and defense policy, libertarian Republicans are noninterventionists.[2] Two-thirds of libertarian Republicans are males.[2]

The Republican Liberty Caucus, which describes itself as "the oldest continuously operating organization in the Liberty Republican movement with state charters nationwide," was founded in 1991.[3] Among the group's past chairs are Chuck Muth.[3]

The House Liberty Caucus is a congressional caucus formed by Representative Justin Amash, Republican of Michigan. In 2014, the group "consisted of about 30 libertarian-inclined Republicans (and occasional Democratic visitors like Jared Polis)."[4] The group is a rival to the conservative Republican Study Committee, which favors high military spending.[4]

Libertarian Democrat:
Ideology[edit]
Libertarian Democrats support the majority of positions of the Democratic Party. However they do not necessarily share identical viewpoints across the political spectrum; that is, they are more likely to support individual and personal freedoms, although rhetorically within the context of Democratic values.[9]

Libertarian Democrats oppose NSA warrantless surveillance. In 2013, well over half the House Democrats (111 of 194) voted to defund the NSA's telephone phone surveillance program.[10]

U.S. Representative Jared Polis, a libertarian-oriented Democrat, wrote in Reason magazine: "I believe that libertarians should vote for Democratic candidates, particularly as our Democratic nominees are increasingly more supportive of individual liberty and freedom than Republicans."[11] He cited opposition to the Stop Online Piracy Act, support for the legalization of marijuana, support for the separation of church and state, support for abortion rights and individual bodily autonomy, opposition to mass surveillance, and support for tax-code reform as areas where the majority of Democrats align well with libertarian values.[11]

While maintaining a relatively libertarian ideology, they may differ with the Libertarian Party on issues such as consumer protection, health care reform, anti-trust laws and the overall amount of government involvement in the economy.[9]

I can find nothing else on the internet grouping these political parties together.

This exchange clearly reveals you are a person who is only interested in diversion, not real discussion, Baldimo.

You and your cohorts flee from discussion as soon as it gets real. As long as the propaganda, the lies, the fabrications, with enough people to keep them at the fore exist, you "discuss".

Until realities intrude upon your brain and then in a flash, you disappear. It's a common feature not only of you conservative leaning folk but of many others within the "liberal" leaning crowd.

Will you now deny the existence of conservative Republicans? Tea Party Republicans?

In fact the biggest fleer of posts is you when people start asking you where you live or what you really believe in.

Says the guy who answers no questions and diverts all discussions towards the evil USA and Sept 11th talk.

The Tea Party was taken over by regular social Conservatives and bastardized by those same people a few years ago. The proof was in the 2012 elections and the many "main stream Republicans" who were suddenly part of the very group who was trying to get rid of them in 2010. Let's be honest as well, the Conservative Republicans are not even close to their "Conservative" roots.

The first is of no consequence

and as for the second, I state very clearly what I believe in. The US should stop its centuries long war crimes, terrorism, genocides, stealing, raping, murdering ways and try to live up to what has been to date, complete bullshit.

Nazi level evil, done by anyone, should be a hot topic. Falsely accusing people should also be a hot topic. Both are ones that all the honest, free speech Americans [and others] avoid like the plague.

Why? When it should be so easy to point out all these "truths" about the USA.

Here you are discussing the very things you seek to deny. Do you have the slightest grasp, the tiniest speck of a grasp on reality, Baldimo?