The anti-gay marriage movement IS homophobic

Chrissee wrote:

Please, Baldimo, to thine own self be true. Your posts revael that when you think about gay marriage, you think about men.

Most people are a lot happier when they get in touch with their true selves.

According to this sort of logic Chrissee I must be a heterosexual because for many years I thought about marrying a woman and then I went to heterosexual weddings. I even enjoy seeing weddings on television and in the movies. If I take what you say to be true Chrissee then thinking about a man and a woman marrying or marriage of men and women in general would make me anything other than a homosexual and yet still I find no interest at the thought of being naked in a marriage bed with a woman. Perhaps I should start thinking more about gay marriages.

0 Replies

Non-sequitur.

0 Replies

Chrissee wrote:

Non-sequitur.

WOULD you mind translating that and perhaps ingratiating us with an elaboration this time or are you going to have another go at the seven dwarfs?

(Doc, Bashful, Sleepy, Sneezy, Grumpy, Happy, Dopey)

0 Replies

Sturgis wrote:

Chrissee wrote:
Non-sequitur.
WOULD you mind translating that and perhaps ingratiating us with an elaboration this time or are you going to have another go at the seven dwarfs?

(Doc, Bashful, Sleepy, Sneezy, Grumpy, Happy, Dopey)

Us?

0 Replies

It is not my fault you didn't study Latin or logic.

0 Replies

All of us unenlightened folk of the world (either that or I have multiple personalities). Surely your great troughs of wisdom can be shared with the lowly peons surrounding you.

0 Replies

Chrissee wrote:

It is not my fault you didn't study Latin or logic.

There is great insanity in the mere idea of studying logic. Simply put it is illogical to study logic. Logic is either something which someone has innately or else they do not. No manual is going to give it to them.

0 Replies

Sturgis wrote:

Chrissee wrote:
It is not my fault you didn't study Latin or logic.

There is great insanity in the mere idea of studying logic. Simply put it is illogical to study logic. Logic is either something which someone has innately or else they do not. No manual is going to give it to them.

Anyone with any decent amount of has the abilty to think logically yet, as we see here, that is not the case. To claim that people can't be trained to think more logically is illogical. I guess people are born understanding Latin too? LOL

Case in point, sturgis claims to be a gay man yet consistently argues against gay issues. Is that logical?

0 Replies

Chrissee wrote:

Sturgis wrote:
Chrissee wrote:
It is not my fault you didn't study Latin or logic.

There is great insanity in the mere idea of studying logic. Simply put it is illogical to study logic. Logic is either something which someone has innately or else they do not. No manual is going to give it to them.

Anyone with any decent amount of has the abilty to think logically yet, as we see here, that is not the case. To claim that people can't be trained to think more logically is illogical. I guess people are born understanding Latin too? LOL

Case in point, sturgis claims to be a gay man yet consistently argues against gay issues. Is that logical?

It's logical to me and that is all that matters.

The facts being what they are Chrissee, I am a gay man who was imbued with the ideas which were around me along with my own inside being. If you search more carefully and deeply you will notice it is not a matter of arguing against gay issues per se. I have indicated that I, as a gay man, have had difficulty comprehending the idea of same gender marriages. This is not a matter of mere logic. It includes the culture I was part of as I grew up and indeed the culture which exists in public and in the media to this very day. It is only recently that I have been able to come to understand and accept same gender unions as being on equal ground and of equal value to hetersexual unions. This part is not about logic. This is about who I was shaped to be thanks to society.

Regarding the matter of Latin, that is not an item I am arguing here. Latin is something which can be learned if one so chooses.

0 Replies

Name calling doesn't get you respect.

A black activist called me a "racist" because I called O.J. Simpson a lying murderer and a thief
(for recently stealing digital cable signals using
illegal equipment to intercept the signals without paying for them. I sued the activist him for defamation and won.

I sued a feminist activist after calling me a "rapist" because I'm married. She say's marriage is "legalized rape", but that part of her statement was taken entirely out of context and others believed I was a "rapist". I won that one too.

Last month my property was vandelized by two local homosexual activists because I opposed a reforendum requiring special treatment for homosexual students at our local high school. The activists accuse me of being "....a vicious right-wing, gun-toting Reagan nutcase..." That part of it is not grounds for slander, but this is: "Conspiring with area Neo-Nazi's attacking gay, bisexual and transgender business people..."

It's true that we have Neo-Nazi's in our community.
It's true they did do these things.
What is not true is they implicated me, calling it "proof of homophobia...."
The two received thier summons today.

I'll tell ya: being a Conservative, Bible-Believing, Born-Again, Pro-Israeli, Pro-Second Amendment WHITE MALE is great. I wouldn't have it any other way.

0 Replies

Just when you think a thread is gone, it gets revived from the dead; much as trolls are reputed to do.

0 Replies

vigalante, Nice that you feel that peoples right to free speech should be stifled.

Considering you have now sued more people than all the people I know combined, you might want to consider why these people are calling you these things.

0 Replies

I protect all free speech. That's why I'm a Vigilante.

Next, the reason I get called these names is because I am politically-INCORRECT, and I refuse to go along with the flow just to get along.
I don't believe in compromising.

When others say "African-American", I say black.
When others say "gay" I say homosexual, or bisexual.
What others refer to as "transgender" I say transexual.
When a guy dresses in drag, I say Halloween (or if it's year
around, I say just plain confused).
When others say "Asian" I say Oriental.
But when others say "Muslim" I say terrorist.

When others say "white guy" I say white guy.
When others use "Caucasion", I say Caucasion.
When others say "racist" I say prove it.
When some feminist yells "rape" I say 24/7-PMS.
When someone says "gun nut" I say good for you!
When others say "mentally ill" I say they're desperate.

Have a nice day.

0 Replies

So, you can call other people names but if they dare call you anything, they get sued? A lot of names come to mind but the top of the list is hypocrite.

0 Replies

Quote:

But when others say "Muslim" I say terrorist.

How about when people say 'bigot?'

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

Don't bite the fly! Sure, the lure is dangling right there, begging for you get grab it, but it's a trick!

And not particularly subtle, either.

When others use "Caucasion" (twice), I say: 14 years old.

0 Replies

The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle song is stuck in my ear.
Cool

0 Replies

Turtles in a half shell!

0 Replies

Vigilante-Justice wrote:

I sued a feminist activist after calling me a "rapist" because I'm married.

You are?

The anti-gay marriage movement IS homophobic

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know