1
   

The NEXT coming Oz election thread!

 
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Jun, 2007 06:48 pm
No problem at all with parliamentarians receiving a pay rise because the appropriate authority deems that they're worth it .... I just wish that same authority could grant the rest of us a 7% rise as well (& similar superannuation perks as well, while it's at it! :wink: ), without workers having to jump through the usual productivity & performance handicaps! Evil or Very Mad :

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2007/06/21/2206_cartoon_gallery__470x292,0.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Jun, 2007 06:55 pm
And speaking of perks ....:

MPs no more, but living life of Riley
Phillip Hudson and Jessica Irvine
June 22, 2007/SMH


TAXPAYERS have picked up the $1.2 million bill for 125 former federal MPs to enjoy free air travel around Australia.

Although they are no longer elected members and not accountable for the trips, the holders of the Life Gold Pass and limited severance benefit are entitled to fly the taxpayer-funded gravy-plane.

The spending tally, released yesterday, reveals the bill forJuly-December 2006 came in at $620,231. It was $587,414 for the first six months of last year.

The figures were among an avalanche of information - given to Parliament in the final hours before the winter break - that shows the current batch of 226 MPs chalked up $4.86 million in domestic scheduled air fares in the last six months of 2006, $3.5 million in private and chauffeur-driven car costs and $3.85 million in overseas travel, which included a 13-day African safari by a NSW backbencher.

The former South Australian Labor MP Martyn Evans, who served 10 years in Parliament, never as a minister, was the top spender in the most recent accounts, charging taxpayers $24,166. His bill for the full financial year was almost $40,000. ...<cont>

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/mps-no-more-but-living-life-of-riley/2007/06/21/1182019286812.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Jun, 2007 07:02 pm
OR this? No less than 6 flights by the RAAF (!) to get Howard & his sons to the cricket in Melbourne & back!:

Howzat: six flights to get Howards to the G
Mark Davis
June 22, 2007/SMH


FOR any cricket fan, the Boxing Day Test in an Ashes series is a highlight of the sporting calendar.

But when the cricket-buff-in-chief, John Howard, took the family to the MCG last year it cost the air force $13,254 to provide a VIP jet to fly the Howards and their sons, Richard and Tim, to Melbourne for the second day's play.

Mr Howard's sons paid commercial rates but taxpayers picked up the rest of the tab.

Documents tabled in Parliament show the RAAF made six flights to get the first family from Sydney to Melbourne and back again on December 27. The Challenger jet flew without passengers from Canberra to Sydney, picked up the Howards and took them to Melbourne.

Then it flew empty to Canberra and returned, empty again, to Melbourne to pick up the Howards and take them home.

At least it was a good day's play, marked by a 279-run partnership between Matthew Hayden and Andrew Symonds.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/howzat-six-flights-to-get-howards-to-the-g/2007/06/21/1182019286740.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Jun, 2007 07:33 pm
Almost a week since the Little Children are Sacred report & the Federal government is taking over. I was hoping that another thread would be started here on this enormously important issue, where the subject could be discussed in more depth than here. Also, after listening to comments from Noel Pearson & opinions from so many others in the media on the plight of aboriginal children in the NT, frankly I feel out of my depth in even suggesting that one approach might be preferable than another. Particularly as many of us had always supported self determination for aboriginal people.
Feedback from anyone with more knowledge about the situation would be much appreciated.:


I'm seizing control, says PM
June 22, 2007/SMH

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2007/06/21/aborig22607_narrowweb__300x450,0.jpg
Time to act ... a child in Wadeye, where many children live in tents, too scared to return home because of violence.
Photo: Terry Trewin


THE Prime Minister has cited a "national emergency" to justify a radical takeover of indigenous affairs that will give the Federal Government control over almost every aspect of Aboriginal life in the Northern Territory.

The unprecedented seizure of federal control will involve draconian measures - including bans on alcohol sales and cuts to welfare payments - to tackle an epidemic of child sexual abuse in the territory. The scale of the problem was revealed in a report released last week, and John Howard challenged the states yesterday to follow his sweeping changes to tackle the crisis.

"We are dealing with children of the tenderest age who have been exposed to the most terrible abuse from the time of their birth, virtually," Mr Howard said. "Any semblance of maintaining the innocence of childhood is a myth in so many of these communities and we feel very strongly that action of this kind is needed."

Parliament is likely to be recalled from its winter break next month to deal with the necessary legislative changes.

These include alcohol bans for six months on indigenous land; bans on pornography; compulsory health checks for all children under 16; a Government takeover of some townships for five years; quarantining up to half of people's welfare payments for up to a year to stop money being spent on drugs and alcohol; and withholding welfare payments if children are not sent to school.


Customary law will be scrapped as a mitigating factor in sentencing and bail decisions.

Each state has been asked to send 10 police officers to the territory to help implement the measures. Military personnel are also likely to be brought in.

The Australian Medical Association will oversee the system of health checks.

The announcement came less than a week after the release of the Little Children are Sacred report, which found no community was free of people preying on children. Mr Howard said the Federal Government had been forced to act because the Northern Territory had not acted swiftly or strongly enough.

"It is interventionist, it does push aside the role of the territory to some degree, I accept that," he said. "But what matters more, the constitutional niceties or the care and protection of young children? We believe the latter is overwhelmingly more important."

The Chief Minister of the Northern Territory, Clare Martin, dismissed Mr Howard's accusation as "utter rubbish".

"If you read the report you will find that many of the recommendations build on things that we are currently doing in the areas of alcohol, education and certainly we will continue to do that," she said. "So to say that this Government was sitting on its hands about this issue, well, we weren't."

Ms Martin, who has been under pressure over her handling of indigenous issues, was handed the report six weeks ago and said her Government would take until August to announce a detailed response to its 97 recommendations.

Ms Martin said she suggested 12 months ago that the Federal Government link family assistance payments to school attendance and was "frustrated" that she did not get a response.

The Federal Opposition offered immediate support for the plan. It said a bipartisan approach was the best way to tackle the child abuse crisis.

The Federal Government's National Indigenous Council supported the measures.

"The nation cannot avert its eyes and close its ears to the abuse and violence being suffered every day by children, women and men in our communities," the council said.

The council's chairwoman, Sue Gordon, will chair a taskforce overseeing the changes the Federal Government is proposing.

A leading academic on indigenous policy, Jon Altman, the director of the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research at the Australian National University, said the Federal Government had failed to deal with underlying problems in Aboriginal communities, such as unemployment.

"Rather than addressing those underlying issues, and they are complex and will take years to address, we are seeing a knee-jerk reaction and blame-shifting onto the Northern Territory Government," Professor Altman said.


http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/06/21/1182019286734.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Jun, 2007 08:08 pm
There are currently so many responses to John Howard's plan in the media. Many suggesting his approach is misguided, racist or not properly thought out. This is the latest post from the ABC. (A lot more coverage via the link to the ABC below.):

More suicides, more violence predicted under abuse plan
Posted 35 minutes ago

Professor Judy Atkinson from Southern Cross University says she was stunned to hear of plans to freeze welfare payments and ban pornography and alcohol from Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory.

She says the Government has not thought through the consequences of its strategy to only target Indigenous communities.

"Some of the things that I know will happen in response to this- we will have an increase of violence, we will have an increase of suicide and suicide attempts," she said.

"There will be greater feelings of despair and we can't do it ourselves in our communities."


Under the plan, the Government will take over about 60 Indigenous communities and implement alcohol bans, free compulsory medical assessments for all NT Indigenous children under 16, a ban on x-rated pornography, and a boost to police numbers.


Racist

John Howard has described the situation as a "national emergency" but his plans have been greeted with anger and widespread scepticism today.

They have been condemned as "racist" by ACT Chief Minister Jon Stanhope.

"This is racist and I don't believe that you can hope for long term sustainable change by engaging in behaviour that impinges human rights, that's racist," he said.

"Give me an example of any racist action anywhere in the world that has ever successfully led to change."

Jeff McMullen from the children's health charity Fountain for Youth says there has been an emergency in the Aboriginal communities his organisation works in for the past 20 years.

But he has questioned the Federal Government's intervention.

"If we go about this like shock troopers then I can tell you ... [that] Aboriginal people will be so fearful about this this morning," he said.

"If we frighten and panic people it will not suceed."

Meanwhile the Northern Territory Anti-Discrimination Commissioner says the measures break anti-discrimination laws.

Tony Fitzgerald says the measures are quite simply discriminatory.

"The restrictions [are being] imposed on Territorians because of their race," he said.

"They're being treated less favourably. The interesting thing under the act and under the Federal act is that the motive for doing discriminatory things is irrelevant.

"So what the acts say are, even if the Feds are sincere about Indigenous welfare, the fact that they are unfair makes it discriminatory."

http://www.abc.com.au/news/stories/2007/06/22/1958939.htm
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Jun, 2007 06:30 am
From today's Crikey! :

Howard's Aboriginal Emergency
Without respect, this will not stand
Malcolm Fraser and Lowitja O'Donoghue write:

The Prime Minister has declared a state of emergency in the Northern Territory to introduce arbitrary measures for Aborigines. While we must all hope that any measures introduced will assist Aborigines achieve their rightful place within the Australian community, a place that recognises their own history and culture, we must at the same time ask how the Government has come to this point?

The Government has been in power for over 10 years. There have been many reported emergencies about alcohol and substance abuse affecting Aboriginal communities. A far cry from Aboriginal communities almost 30 years ago which on their own account and with the support of their communities, did not allow anyone to bring alcohol into those communities. There has been awareness of the damage that can be done over many decades and not least amongst Aboriginal leadership.

Current measures have been introduced without any overt sign that there has been consultation with Aboriginal leadership or with Aboriginal elders from different communities. Without respect, without discussion and agreement it is difficult to see any measures working as effectively as one would want. There are other elements significantly lacking in this latest statement.

Two great needs for Aboriginal communities especially in remote communities are improved health and better access to education. There is a health component to the Government's current program but primary healthcare at the very least needs to be available on a continuous basis. Better availability of health care is needed for all communities and much better availability of education for all Aboriginal children, an education that gives some hope that there is a future, that there will be jobs, there will be respect and the promise of the 1967 referendum fulfilled.

Despite popular conception, funds both for Aboriginal education and for Aboriginal health are far less than they should have been, far less generous than policies adopted by the Canadian Government and far more paternal in their application in recent times and some would say a return to paternalism is regressive.

As one result of the Government's overall approach, why are their fewer Aborigines studying at Australian universities today then there were when the Government came to office? That is a consequence of which too few are aware.

Quite apart from adequately providing such common and ordinary services which most of us take for granted, the Government has said that if people want to live on remote communities it will not provide services. Is that a policy of starve them out? We provide services for remote communities where there are non-indigenous Australians such as the School of the Air. That was a remarkable initiative for a remote white communities. Is that the end of our enterprise?

ATSIC did not meet the high expectations many had of it, but its abolition supported by the Labor Party, further eroded hope and belief in the future on the part of many Aborigines even though the leadership of ATSIC had by no means distinguished itself. It should have been very substantially reformed or replaced by elected leadership from specific regions, establishing Aboriginal councils with responsibilities to their own communities. Those councils could elect a representative to a national body to advise governments more broadly. This is just one suggestion of a framework that might work.

Instead, today there is an appointed advisory council, a throwback to past years, to past paternalism which assumed superiority of government and its instruments. That approach did not work then.

As we are advised we are the only Western democracy with a significant indigenous minority that has no elected presentation of any kind. We are the only such country where trachoma remains a significant debilitating problem. Our governments pretend to be generous to Third World aid, from time to time. There is a 'Third World' living within Australia, to Australia's shame.

We can be pleased that the Government accepts there is an emergency that requires action. But their first step needs a more broad-based approach which rests upon respect, upon self-esteem and on the recognition of a real partnership.
0 Replies
 
bungie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Jun, 2007 04:56 pm
msolga wrote:

Why can't Rudd be clever enough not to fall for such tactics every single time? And why is he allowing the media debate about IR issues to be side-tracked in this way, time & time again? Why didn't he stand up for the rights of the workers at this site & their rights to have union representation there rather than playing the tough guy for the media? He's being manipulated & played for a fool & at workers' expense, that's what I think. Rolling Eyes :

Absolutely spot on msolga. What a set up that was... video camera and all ! Me wonders how many libs have been expelled from their party for underpaying, or workplaces health and safety violations ?

It's a pity politicians don't have to prove productivity increases to obtain a pay rise. ( If that were the case, pollies would have to take hefty pay cuts)

And the next set up .......

Remember children "overboard" ? ....
Now it's children "outback"....
This has been a terrible problem for years ... strange how it's now such an important issue.
Do I smell an election in the air ?
0 Replies
 
bungie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jun, 2007 02:31 pm

Come on, John. You are lying through your teeth again. You must really be grasping at straws in an election year if you need to further blame Aborigines to take the heat off your environment, broadband and IR woes.

Gregory Phillips is a medical anthropologist specialising in healing, post-traumatic stress syndromes and addictions in indigenous communities.
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2007/06/22/1182019361459.html
0 Replies
 
bungie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Jun, 2007 02:59 pm
From the Age 2005

Howard's high stakes IR gamble
October 18, 2005

Illustration: Andrew Dyson
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2005/10/17/wbOPINION2_narrowweb__200x247,1.jpg

There's another job that could be put at risk by these needless workplace changes - John Howard's, writes Tim Colebatch.
Professor Ian Harper,The Age, July 9, 2005.
"A wise old buzzard said to me when I was a young person: 'Beware the day, Ian, when you become so important and powerful that people don't tell you the truth any more. When people defer to you, you actually start to believe that you are immune. The second stage comes when you begin to feel you deserve these things'."

One can only hope bonzai has pulled the trip rope hard enough.

bonzai=little bush
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Jun, 2007 06:05 am
Like this, bungie? :wink: :

http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2007/06/23/wbTOONweldon2306_gallery__470x339.jpg
0 Replies
 
Dutchy
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Jun, 2007 06:24 am
A joke for a change. Smile

John Howard and Kevin Rudd somehow ended up at the same barbershop.

As they sat there, each being worked on by a different barber, not a word was spoken. The barbers were both afraid to start a conversation, for fear it would turn Into politics

As the barbers finished their shaves, the one who had Kevin Rudd in his chair reached for the aftershave

Kevin was quick to stop him jokingly saying, "No thanks, my Wife will smell that and think I've been in a brothel"

The second barber turned to John Howard and said, "How about you Mr. Howard?"

John replied, "Go ahead, Jeanette doesn't know what the inside of a brothel smells like"
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Jun, 2007 06:34 am
Laughing Dutchy
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Jun, 2007 06:45 am
<sigh>:

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2007/06/23/cartoon230607_gallery__470x318.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Jun, 2007 07:19 am
Oh for crying out loud!
Another case of "union thuggery" for Shrek to express outrage about!

It seems this is how these acts of "thuggery" occur:

CFMEU representative goes to work site (in this case, a safety issue)
Boss demands the union official leaves. (in this case police were called in.)
Argument follows.
CFMEU official tells the boss's representative where they can go, using very colourful language!
Union rep videoed/taped using colourful language.
Joe Hockey (Shrek) releases tape to the media. "Union intimidation & lawlessness out of controll!"
Libs demand to know what Rudd is going to do about this outrageous "lawlessness".
Rudd (looking very solemn) condemns such behaviour & language. It will be followed by an expulsion from the ALP, or a serious investigation will follow! This sort of behaviour is not part of the Rudd ALP!
Rudd says nothing about provocation on the part of the employer, nor about the union rep's rights to be at the site representing his members.
Shrek & Howard rub their hands with glee. Another day when IR issues don't make the headlines & they can carry on about "militant unions" running the ALP. Mission accomplished!


Duh, Kevin!

Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes :[/color]

CFMEU says Hockey pre-empting police inquiry
Posted 2 hours 41 minutes ago
Updated 2 hours 40 minutes ago


In the videotape released by the Minister's office today, a construction manager appears to fall on stairs when Construction, Mining and Forestry Union (CFMEU) officials go past him to conduct a safety inspection.

Mr Hockey says he has had an extensive briefing.

"It's quite clear that there is an altercation; there is a pattern of behaviour here from CFMEU officials," he said.

But CFMEU construction division national secretary Dave Noonan says the evidence is far from clear. ... <cont>

http://www.abc.com.au/news/stories/2007/06/24/1960437.htm
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Jun, 2007 07:27 am
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2007/06/23/svCARTOON_gallery__470x340.jpg
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Jun, 2007 07:39 am
.... so I guess that means that the Libs' go off & hatch their next (tax payer funded) media blitz (to compliment the planned "independent" business lobby ad blitz about the wonderfulness of the IR laws & the threat to civilization as we know it from lawless unions should ALP win power) ... while Kevin & Julia consider the necessity of all those CMFEU expulsions from the Party!

Crikey! Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Jun, 2007 07:41 am
A perfect moment for another joke, Dutchy! :wink:
0 Replies
 
bungie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Jun, 2007 12:18 pm
http://www.nicholsoncartoons.com.au/cartoons/new/2007-06-21%20Rudd%20zero%20tolerance%20of%20union%20violence%20226.jpg

Nicholson of "The Australian" newspaper: www.nicholsoncartoons.com.au
0 Replies
 
bungie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Jun, 2007 12:25 pm
What's all this talk about global warming ??????




http://www.nicholsoncartoons.com.au/cartoons/new/2008-05-19%20Howard%20new%20climate%20policy%20226233.jpg

Nicholson of "The Australian" newspaper: www.nicholsoncartoons.com.au
0 Replies
 
bungie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Jun, 2007 12:55 pm

Now for a laugh :-)

John Howard Commemorative Stamp.

Australia Post has issued a recall of a stamp they created
with a picture of John Howard to honor his achievements
while serving as Prime Minister of our nation.

The problem was discovered when claims had been made
that the stamp was not sticking to envelopes, and that mail
which had been sent using the "John" postage was not being
delivered. Peter Costello demanded a full investigation into the allegations.

A special Postal Service Investigation team was formed and
after several months and many dollars spent, made the following findings:

*The stamp was manufactured properly.
*There was nothing wrong with the adhesive.
*People were just spitting on the wrong side. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Beached As Bro - Discussion by dadpad
Oz election thread #3 - Rudd's Labour - Discussion by msolga
Australian music - Discussion by Wilso
Oz Election Thread #6 - Abbott's LNP - Discussion by hingehead
AUstralian Philosophers - Discussion by dadpad
Australia voting system - Discussion by fbaezer
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/17/2025 at 11:16:57