Hmmm... That makes a strong case for Judaism. Any chance you might waive the circumcision thing?
George wrote:Hmmm... That makes a strong case for Judaism. Any chance you might waive the circumcision thing?
It's not so bad once you get used to it....
I was raised sort of jewish, and it always bothered me when they brought up "The chosen people" it made me cringe. I'm a big fan of the everyone is born equal under god mentality, and from there people have a series of individual things to deal with and character-build. But if god has a chosen people from the off-set, then it implies that everyone else is un-chosen. Which seemed inherently cruel.
Portal Star wrote:I was raised sort of jewish, and it always bothered me when they brought up "The chosen people" it made me cringe. I'm a big fan of the everyone is born equal under god mentality, and from there people have a series of individual things to deal with and character-build. But if god has a chosen people from the off-set, then it implies that everyone else is un-chosen. Which seemed inherently cruel.
Really? Perhaps you misunderstood:
GOD NAMES NEXT "CHOSEN PEOPLE"; IT'S JEWS AGAIN: "Oh ****," Say Jews
I was raised sort of jewish, and it always bothered me when they:
A. chanting repeatedly. This is true of any religion - almost all feature mantras of some kind. They would chant and chant the same words repeatedly until it became this sort of brainwashing ritual. This has disturbed me in Jewish and buddhist temples, mosques, and churches. When people chant that much, they forget what it is they are saying or thinking about and turn into this religious mob-like entity.
B. Before I became an agnostic, everytime they brought up "The chosen people" it made me cringe. I'm a big fan of the everyone is born equal under god mentality, and from there people have a series of individual things to deal with and character-build. But if god has a chosen people from the off-set, then it implies that everyone else is un-chosen. Which seemed inherently cruel.
Portal Star wrote:I was raised sort of jewish, and it always bothered me when they:
A. chanting repeatedly. This is true of any religion - almost all feature mantras of some kind. They would chant and chant the same words repeatedly until it became this sort of brainwashing ritual. This has disturbed me in Jewish and buddhist temples, mosques, and churches. When people chant that much, they forget what it is they are saying or thinking about and turn into this religious mob-like entity.
B. Before I became an agnostic, everytime they brought up "The chosen people" it made me cringe. I'm a big fan of the everyone is born equal under god mentality, and from there people have a series of individual things to deal with and character-build. But if god has a chosen people from the off-set, then it implies that everyone else is un-chosen. Which seemed inherently cruel.
Portal Star,
I would respectfully suggest that the chanting thing can be used for good or ill. I have found it to be the same as you noted; and to be useful for meditation; and to be totally irrelevant if I do indeed concentrate on what it is that I am saying.
It all depends on the effort I make.
And, other than ForeverYoung's very apt comment, the Torah says that the Jews are "chosen" to take on special responsibilities (and apparently very few of the commensurate priviledges that might go with them). Being "chosen" as in being "better" is not a particulary religious Jewish concept.
It is a very human concept however. It could even ease the pain of being chosen....
ForeverYoung wrote:Portal Star wrote:I was raised sort of jewish, and it always bothered me when they brought up "The chosen people" it made me cringe. I'm a big fan of the everyone is born equal under god mentality, and from there people have a series of individual things to deal with and character-build. But if god has a chosen people from the off-set, then it implies that everyone else is un-chosen. Which seemed inherently cruel.
Really? Perhaps you misunderstood:
GOD NAMES NEXT "CHOSEN PEOPLE"; IT'S JEWS AGAIN: "Oh ****," Say Jews
When it gets down to it, modern Judaism is a culture, not a religion. The old testament is extinct in comparison with our way of living (in my opinion, so is the new testament) and must be interpreted to the extent that we are no longer shocked at god killing innocents, or stoning women to death for being unfaithful, or testing people's faith like an insolent child - by threatening the innocent.
Quote:When it gets down to it, modern Judaism is a culture, not a religion. The old testament is extinct in comparison with our way of living (in my opinion, so is the new testament) and must be interpreted to the extent that we are no longer shocked at god killing innocents, or stoning women to death for being unfaithful, or testing people's faith like an insolent child - by threatening the innocent.
I understand the rest of your post and I definitely believe that to each his own...
Be whom you want to be.
However...
For those of us who actually believe in G-d and Torah and mitzvos, Judaism is a relgion. As with all religions, it has developed its own culture, but for religious Jews, the (secular) "culture of Judaism" is not something we find particulary inspiring or useful. It just is.
I agree that the style of Judaism that you were brought up with must have been less than useful if your view of G-d and the Torah is as you say it is. I can't argue with that.
But, I would again respectfully submit that your interpretation of G-d and the Torah is not an accepted "religious" interpretation.
It may well be the cultural interpretation that you complain of, but it is not the religious one.
The religious view of Judaism is one of joy and fellowship and study and redemption and mercy and compassion and understanding and hope.
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
(Hamlet I.v. 174-175)
If you were following a literal interpretation of the Torah, you would be having sex through a sheet, killed if you didn't bleed, and you would be confined to a house with other women on your period - a sinful time. You wouldn't even be allowed to be a jew, because judaism is for men. As for the men, they must have beards and payess, and go to shul every week, etc. etc. etc. Not to mention animal sacrafice.
Plus, Jews, who pride themself on education - can probably more clearly see that Adam and Eve and Noah were both myths. So, which parts do you take literally? And how do you know what god is if there is no evidence of god outside of this doctrine which you don't wholly believe in anyway?
I see that you acknowledge that the Torah, in itself, is tedious and confusing and generally not applicable in its direct form to our every day life. That is basically what I was shooting for.
On a side note I find this celebrity pseudo-kabbalah phase really irritating, but then again I find scientology really irritating.
I regret none of the history, and, also in response to Dauer, I do "mitzvas," but strictly through charity organizations/health organizations and never handouts to beggars (who never seem to make good use of the money, being that the majority of them are drug addicts or have mental problems.)
Dauer - if you need oral history, then the Torah isn't something you can literally read and believe in. That was my point.
And sex through a hole in a sheet is done upon the marriage night in strict orthodox jewish tradition, isn't it? I may be confused about the religion here, but I thought it was orthodox jew. Maybe it was something a sect of Judaism picked up trough contact with the Persians.
And no, facts are just fine. Myths are fun and interesting can can be used for teaching - I love science fiction or a good tale, but that doesn't make it reality.
Why on earth are you calling my character into question?
Being atheist/agnostic has absolutely nothing to do with immorality.