The Netherlands set up global safe abortion fund to counter Trump cuts

I'll assume you are being facetious but just in case you are serious.

Here's your alternate fact: "Further proof that the US does not need to bank roll the world".

Izzythepush told you and provided facts to prove his point. Are you going to now suggest that you failed to see them?

In his defence it must be hard to see anything with his tongue stuck way up there. This is what he does, make up a load of bollocks, then get nasty when proven wrong. Once the proof is irrefutable he puts on this lame display. That's what being funny looks like if you don't have a sense of humour.

Britain will lead efforts to secure extra funding for family planning at an international summit in London, ministers have said, amid concern about Donald Trump’s decision to ban US financial support for organisations involved in abortion services overseas.

Priti Patel, the international development secretary, said the summit would take place in July, and the UK was aiming for a “step-change on family planning”.

The event was planned before Trump signed an executive order reintroducing the so-called “global gag rule” relating to abortion services. However, it is likely to be an opportunity for those involved in family planning to address concerns about the shortfall in funding that result from the US president’s move.

Patel revealed the date for the summit in a letter to Labour MPs who have called on the government to help make up the shortfall. She said the event “will help secure renewed global commitment to family planning services, with a particular focus on the poorest and most vulnerable”.

I know you think it's funny acting like a gormless berk, but it's really too close to the truth. The proof is irrefutable, you just don't like it, that's all.

I provided a link, there's the beef. You've just made up some figure off the top of your head, that's not even half a Yorkshire pud. America lags at 21st, behind Greece.

The US, unsurprisingly, comes top when looking at total spend. Last year, it gave over $30 billion either as bilateral aid or through international organizations such as the World Bank or UN.
[...]
A very different picture emerges, though, if we consider it as a percentage of gross national income.

This does nothing to refute what I said, but thanks for adding to the conversation.