Do you reject EVERYTHING you don't understand? I mean do have your own ideas on electricity? How about aerodynamics? Is there any science you DO accept?
Lets play fair.
You are curious of why I reject several of those good for nothing theories, those theories that enjoy your support.
You have now the opportunity to provide your own opinion, an opinion free of the doctrines of those theories.
I will give you an example of how these good for nothing theories are used as influence for observation of phenomena, and why your current position when is about science is very questionable.
Please, follow the example. And please answer the question the best as you can.
The example is very simple.
The telescopes using the most recent technology are detecting galaxies going away. The distance of these galaxies is increasing very fast in relation to our position in the cosmos.
These galaxies appear to travel very fast when going away.
At one moment, it has been calculated that their speed must be over the speed of light -180,000 miles per second- because they seem to disappear from our sight in a very short period of time.
According to one theory, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light -180,000 miles per second- and in exchange it does exist another theory claiming that space is expanding. When these two theories are put one against the another, the result agrees with both.
The conclusion is that the galaxies are not traveling faster than the speed of light -180,000 miles per second- but there is the process of the expansion of space the one carrying these galaxies at the assumed faster than light speed.
Put those theories on one side.
With the best that you can, explain why those galaxies "suddenly" disappear from our sight while going away from us.
Find another answer for the observation of this phenomenon without the influence of the current theories..
This is the way I study science, when I use all possibilities, read and analyze the "genesis" of each theory, verify if their sources are factual and reliable, and so forth.
I already have the answer for that phenomenon given in the example, an answer which can be tested millions of times and always comes successful.
I want you please, to read the example and give the answer to my request.
Hope you find the same answer I found years ago, an answer which deletes the claim that those galaxies must be traveling that fast due to expansion of space.