0
   

News & discussion on house and senate races

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 03:57 am
Quote:
Democrats Now Favored to Take Over DeLay's Old Seat
By Greg Giroux | 7:05 PM; Aug. 28, 2006 | Email This Article
The Texas Republican Party establishment has rallied around a single candidate, Houston City Councilwoman Shelley Sekula-Gibbs, in their unusual write-in campaign to salvage the 22nd Congressional District seat vacated in June by Tom DeLay, the former House majority leader.

But the extreme rarity of successful write-in campaigns for Congress and the presence of a solid Democratic nominee on the ballot in former Rep. Nick Lampson has prompted CQPolitics.com to change its rating on the 22nd District race to Leans Democratic from No Clear Favorite.
http://www.cqpolitics.com/2006/08/democrats_now_favored_to_take.html
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Sep, 2006 08:40 am
Katherine Harris (leading the underhwelming pack in the Republican primaries for the Senate elections in Florida, for those of you who have hid under a rock for the past 6 months Wink is becoming more and more of a ... phenomenon. Yeah, lets call it that.

For five minutes of rather scary-yet-funny disconnect, look at the YouTube video of Harris's appearance on Hardball on this Raw Story page.

As Salon's War Room notes:

Quote:
Orlando Sentinel columnist Mike Thomas is urging Floridians to vote for Katherine Harris in next week's Republican primary for one reason and one reason only: the entertainment value. Denying Harris a shot at Democratic Bill Nelson in November would be like "yanking 'Desperate Housewives' halfway through the season," Thomas writes.

"Our very own Bree Van de Kamp puts on that peach sweater, screws a smile on her face and bravely carries on even as her ungrateful Republican family stabs her in the back and the world disintegrates around her. Do you want to miss the meltdown in the season finale? Do you want to miss a debate between Katherine and Bill, with Tim Russert as moderator?"
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Sep, 2006 09:42 am
nimh

I saw that news item at broadcast. Irrespressibility is an interesting characteristic. It doesn't have to be atttached to intelligence, to truthfulness, to correct estimation, or to any of the criteria most of us use to help establish our forward path. It seems more of a full moon thing, or muses singing in the trees.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Sep, 2006 07:13 am
Quote:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-midterm3sep03,0,3663544.story?coll=la-home-headlines

Five or six more pages
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Sep, 2006 07:20 am
Quote:
More GOP Districts Counted as Vulnerable
Number Doubled Over the Summer

By Dan Balz and David S. Broder
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, September 3, 2006; Page A01

Facing the most difficult political environment since they took control of Congress in 1994, Republicans begin the final two months of the midterm campaign in growing danger of losing the House while fighting to preserve at best a slim majority in the Senate, according to strategists and officials in both parties.

Over the summer, the political battlefield has expanded well beyond the roughly 20 GOP House seats originally thought to be vulnerable. Now some Republicans concede there may be almost twice as many districts from which Democrats could wrest the 15 additional seats they need to take control.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/02/AR2006090200975.html
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Sep, 2006 10:31 am
Greg Giroux wrote:
Democrats Now Favored to Take Over DeLay's Old Seat
| 7:05 PM; Aug. 28, 2006 |

.......But the extreme rarity of successful write-in campaigns for Congress and the presence of a solid Democratic nominee on the ballot in former Rep. Nick Lampson has prompted CQPolitics.com to change its rating on the 22nd District race to Leans Democratic from No Clear Favorite.


Two years ago, at the height of his power, DeLay only got 55% of the vote in that seat.

Now, in what appears to be a Democratic election season, the Republicans are represented by a write-in candidate.

For those two reasons alone, it seems incredibly unlikely that the Republican candidate could win the seat.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Sep, 2006 10:39 am
Any hopes GOP adherents might have of Bush's popularity creeping up this election season, becoming less of a drag on the Republican Congressional and Senate candidates, received a couple of setbacks this week.

In the most recent Newsweek poll, Bush's popularity declined 2% in the last two weeks, down to 36%.

And the Cook poll showed his popularity holding steady, but his unfavorability rating going up four points, from 51 to 55 percent from a month ago.



Favorability Polls

Newsweek 8/11 38-55
Newsweek 8/25 36-56

Cook 7/30 39-51
Cook 8/27 39-55
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Sep, 2006 03:03 pm
Quote:
War Turns Southern Women Away From GOP


By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: September 7, 2006
Filed at 6:08 a.m. ET

MACON, Ga. (AP) -- President Bush's once-solid relationship with Southern women is on the rocks. ''I think history will show him to be the worst president since Ulysses S. Grant,'' said Barbara Knight, a self-described Republican since birth and the mother of three. ''He's been an embarrassment.'' In the heart of Dixie, comparisons to Grant, a symbol of the Union, is the worst sort of insult, especially from a Macon woman who voted for Bush in 2000 but turned away in 2004.

In recent years, Southern women have been some of Bush's biggest fans, defying the traditional gender gap in which women have preferred Democrats to Republicans. Bush secured a second term due in large part to support from 54 percent of Southern female voters while women nationally favored Democrat John Kerry, 51-48 percent.

''In 2004, you saw an utter collapse of the gender gap in the South,'' said Karen Kaufmann, a professor of government at the University of Maryland who has studied women's voting patterns. White Southern women liked Bush because ''he spoke their religion and he spoke their values.''

Now, anger over the Iraq war and frustration with the country's direction have taken a toll on the president's popularity and stirred dissatisfaction with the Republican-held Congress.

Republicans on the ballot this November have reason to worry. A recent Associated Press-Ipsos poll found that three out of five Southern women surveyed said they planned to vote for a Democrat in the midterm elections. With control of the Senate and House in the balance, such a seismic shift could have dire consequences for the GOP.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Southern-Women.html
0 Replies
 
SierraSong
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Sep, 2006 05:35 pm
Shifting Winds for GOP


blatham wrote:
A recent Associated Press-Ipsos poll found that three out of five Southern women surveyed said they planned to vote for a Democrat in the midterm elections.


This will most likely fall on deaf ears, but I wouldn't put too much stock in this poll if I were you (unless you can find it corroborated perhaps on Gallup or Rasmussen. The typical AP-Ipsos polling breakdown is nearly 50 percent Democrat, less than 40 percent Republican & 10-12 percent Independent. In other words, pretty much useless.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Sep, 2006 06:37 am
sierra song

Interested in a little Nov 7 wager? Say, a hunnert smackers? To be mailed this week to a trusted third party?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Sep, 2006 07:21 am

These two polls constitute an improval over two June-July polls of SurveyUSA and Rasmussen, when Klobuchar was leading with only 3-5%.

------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Missouri U.S. Senate: McCaskill 47%, Talent 46%

September 7, 2006

[A]ccording to the latest poll by Research 2000 [..] 47 per cent of respondents in the Show Me State would vote for Democrat [challenger] Claire McCaskill, while 46 per cent would support Republican incumbent Jim Talent. A late August survey by Gallup gave Talent a six-point edge over McCaskill. [..]


------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
New Jersey U.S. Senate: Kean 44%, Menendez 39%

September 7, 2006

Tom Kean holds the lead in New Jersey's election to the United States Senate, according to the latest survey by Rasmussen Reports. 44 per cent of respondents in the Garden State would vote for the Republican, while 39 per cent would support Democrat Robert Menendez. A late August Fairleigh Dickinson University PublicMind poll gave Kean a four-point edge over Menendez. [..]

Menendez was first elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1992. Born to Cuban parents, he is currently one of only three Hispanics in the upper house.

These polls are very good news for Kean, who was recently in the news for bucking party discipline and demanding Rumsfeld's resignation. Before these two polls, only 1 out of 9 polls in June-August had him in the lead; the others had him down anything between 1 and 6 points.

------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Washington U.S. Senate: Cantwell 48%, McGavick 43%

September 6, 2006

Democrat Maria Cantwell could win a new six-year term as one of Washington's representatives to the United States Senate, according to the latest poll by Strategic Vision [a Republican-affiliated pollster - nimh]. 48 per cent of respondents would vote for the incumbent, while 43 per cent would support Republican challenger Mike McGavick. A late August poll by SurveyUSA gave Cantwell a 17-point edge over McGavick. [..]

Cantwell was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2000, defeating incumbent Republican Slade Gorton by just over 2,000 ballots.

The Strategic Vision poll represents a 1-point improvement for Cantwell, while her 17-point lead in the SurveyUSA poll contrasts favourably with two prior Rasmussen polls in July and August, that had her up by 6% and 11%. The SurveyUSA poll is one of all registered voters though, while the others were only of likely voters (Republicans tend to make up a higher proportion of likely voters).

------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Arizona U.S. Senate: Kyl 46%, Pederson 36%

September 6, 2006

Republican Jon Kyl could earn a new six-year term as one of Arizona's representatives to the United States Senate, according to the latest poll by the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University. 46 per cent of respondents [..] would vote for Kyl in this year's election, while 36 per cent would support Democrat Jim Pederson. A late August poll by Rasmussen Reports gave Kyl a 17-point edge over Pederson.

Kyl was first elected to the U.S. Senate in 1994, and earned a new six-year term in 2000, defeating three independent candidates with 79 per cent of all cast ballots. [..] No Arizona Democrat has served in the U.S. Senate since the retirement of Dennis W. DeConcini in 1995.

History makes this a long shot for the Democrats, but the 10-point Kyl lead in that last poll is smaller than any in the last four polls, which had Kyl leading by 12-19%.

------------------------------------------------------

Throwing a Governor's race in the mix:



------------------------------------------------------

More from Rhode Island:

Quote:
Rhode Island Senate: Whitehouse (D) 44% Chafee 42%

rasmussenreports.com
Tue Sep 5

Rhode Island Senator Lincoln Chafee (R) has pulled to within two points of challenger Sheldon Whitehouse in his bid for re-election. The latest Rasmussen Reports poll in Rhode Island shows Whitehouse earning support from 44% of voters while Chafee attracts 42%. Whitehouse had a six point lead last month.

Based upon this poll we are shifting the Rhode Island Senate race from "Leans Democrat" to "Toss-Up" in ur Senate Balance of Power ratings. Rhode Island is the fifth race in the Toss-Up category.

Though he has his sights set on Whitehouse, Chafee must first face off against his primary challenger, Cranston Mayor Stephen Laffey. The Providence Journal reports that Chafee has outspent Laffey $2.85 million to $1.18 million thus far as they head toward the September 12 showdown. The Whitehouse campaign will be cheering for Laffey on primary night, as the current poll shows Whitehouse leading that potential head-to-head contest 58% to 31%.

If Laffey defeats Chafee in the Republican Primary, this race will immediately be shifted to the Democrats column in our Senate Balance of Power ratings. [..]

Interestingly, equal percentages of voters say they have "very favorable" (20%) and "very unfavorable" (18%) opinions of both Chafee and Whitehouse. Even more interesting is the fact that Chafee gets better marks from Democrats than Republicans. Twenty-one percent (21%) of Democrats have a "very favorable" opinion of Chafee compared to only 14% of the GOP faithful.

Overall, the sitting senator is up with voters from both parties. Sixty-three percent (63%) of GOP voters and 28% of Democrats now say they support Chafee. Those numbers were 59% and 19%, respectively, in the last poll.

Most Rhode Island voters (54%) view Chafee as politically moderate. Twenty-nine percent (29%) see their Senator as liberal and 11% say he's a conservative.

For Whitehouse, the numbers are 39% liberal, 34% moderate, and 8% conservative.

Both candidates are seen as far to the left of President Bush who is seen as politically conservative by 66% of Rhode Island voters. Distance from the President is a good thing in this left leaning state that doesn't place much confidence in the performance of the President.

When asked who they trust more on matters relating to national security and the war in Iraq, 56% say the Democrats in Congress and 36% choose President Bush. The numbers diverge even further when it comes to managing the economy; 60% choose Congressional Democrats and slightly less than one-third (31%) choose the President.

Rhode Island is one of five states now listed in the Toss-Up Category for Election 2006. Three of the other four are also held by Republicans (Montana, Missouri, and Ohio). The only Toss-Up race for seat currently held by Democrats is in New Jersey.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Sep, 2006 05:22 am
This polling result is off topic but it will likely become THE hot button issue given a Dem favorable result in November...

Quote:
Fifty-seven percent of the respondents said they think it would be good for the country "if the Democrats in Congress were able to conduct official investigations into what the Bush administration has done in the past six years." Forty-one percent said such probes would be bad for the country. Half of the sample was asked this question, also.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Sep, 2006 08:17 am
(The "Klobuchar" name kept rolling around, then when I saw it this morning thought "Jim Klobuchar" and looked him up, used to read him all the time in the Strib [Mpls Star-Tribune], Amy's his daughter. Cool.)
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Sep, 2006 07:22 am
Vermont candidates - normally on the frugal and modest side - have already spent $15 per resident - and we're still in the primary stage.

Responsibility lies with Republican contender Rich Tarrant, a multimillionaire who has spent millions of his own money, much of it on at times near-slanderous TV ads.

Socialist independent (and odds-on favourite) Bernie Sanders, the current House representative of Vermont, has nearly kept pace in fundraising, however, mostly by attracting individual contributions.

0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Sep, 2006 02:54 pm
No effect noticeable in the polls on individual states that I can see, but when it comes to the national mood there's some good news for Republicans as Bush is enjoying a distinct upturn:

Bush Approval: Surge continues, ABC at 42%

The latest ABC/WaPo poll which has Bush back to 42% approval is admittedly on the rosy end of recent polls, but it is illustrating a more general trend over the past three weeks:

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/5136/1985/400/currentBushApproval20060907.png

Mind you, as you can see the upturn hasnt proceeded far enough to undo the losses earlier this year - and it becomes little more than a slight uptick if we place it in a slightly longer-term context of Bush's approval ratings:

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/5136/1985/400/BushFullTerm20060910.png

It's also, as you can see, not the first time he's had an uptick breaking his five-year fall -- and so far, every uptick has consistently been followed by a fall to yet new depths. But still, Political Arithmetik warns:

Quote:
What looked like looming disaster for November, with a President in the low 30s or even the high 20s, now looks like a midterm with a President who has low, but not disasterously low, approval ratings.

The current handicapping by Charlie Cook and others is that the Democratic position has strengthened in a number of House races, with some analysts suggesting a 20+ seat gain is not out of the question for the Democrats.

If that happens, it will have much to do with the strength of the local candidates, and rather less to do with a wildly unpopular president.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Sep, 2006 03:06 pm
Interesting: in central Minnesota, a Republican State Senator who otherwise had hewed close to the socially conservative line, last year opposed an effort to force a floor vote on a constitutional gay marriage ban, and soon thereafter outed himself as gay.

Otherwise, he's still a red state type of candidate, opposing abortion, supporting gun rights.

Now he is running for re-election. He won the Republican Party's endorsement too, if barely. But he faces a strong primary opponent in Kevin Goedker, a city councilman.

Quote:
[Goedker] says it isn't because his opponent is gay. But he's making an explicit appeal to voters whose values guide them in the voting booth.

"People of high moral values and integrity must rally and support candidates who will work to bring ethics, morals and family values back into government," Goedker's brother Gene, his campaign treasurer, wrote in a fundraising letter. [..]

Goedker [also] said he wouldn't vote for Koering in the general election.

"In my opinion I think it'd be tough to be gay and to be somebody I'd vote for based on some of the life choices they make," Goedker said.

Gay GOP candidate runs in Minn. primary

The article quotes the Victory Fund, which raises campaign funds for gay candidates, as saying there are currently 325 openly gay elected officials in the country, out of about 511,000 elected offices:

"The group doesn't break that figure down by party, but "the vast majority of them are Democrats," spokesman Denis Dison said."

It also notes that "Like Koering, most prominent gay Republicans came out only after they were in office, including U.S. Rep. Jim Kolbe of Arizona and former U.S. Rep. Steve Gunderson of Wisconsin."
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Sep, 2006 04:55 pm
nimh wrote:
No effect noticeable in the polls on individual states that I can see, but when it comes to the national mood there's some good news for Republicans as Bush is enjoying a distinct upturn:


I disagree. That 29% was of course the lowest poll and that was some months ago. Other polls at the time had Bush rated at 33% or 34%, typically.

This new poll at 42% is indeed the most favorable, with most polls putting Bush in the high 30's. In other words, in the last few months he's gone up about four points or so.

When it comes to Presidents, typically they have 40% against them, 40% for them, and the middle 20% decides the balance. Bush's rise toward 40% is quite predictable, as some Republicans who are disgusted with him return to the fold as Election Day nears. It is unlikely that he is going to get much past that, though.

Here are the last eight polls from Pollingreport.com. I sure don't see any wildly encouraging news for Republicans here.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v645/kelticwizard100/Bushratingspollingreport.jpg
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Sep, 2006 06:08 pm
kelticwizard wrote:
In other words, in the last few months he's gone up about four points or so.

That would be the good news (for him) that I mentioned, yes. Up 4% is always "some good news", regardless of what it is up from.

I see that the graphs I linked in dont show up here, btw - just red crosses. Lemme look at that.

kelticwizard wrote:
When it comes to Presidents, typically they have 40% against them, 40% for them, and the middle 20% decides the balance. Bush's rise toward 40% is quite predictable, as some Republicans who are disgusted with him return to the fold as Election Day nears. It is unlikely that he is going to get much past that, though.

Bush is not up for election, though. I only post his approval rating as indicator of national mood. And even relative upticks at a low level can be meaningful in that respect. In the mid-term Congress elections, turnout is distinctly lower than in presidential election years, which gives loyal partisans a greater impact on the result. One of the major concerns for the Republican side this year has been, however, that their loyal partisans have not seemed to be feeling very loyal at all, and not very driven to turn out either. So if "some Republicans who are disgusted with him return to the fold", that can change the dynamic of a bunch of close races.

If Bush stays back up at 40%, it's likely to mean that at least loyal Republicans voters aren't particularly turned off by him, and wont stay away from the polls out of sheer resentment at him. Whereas if he goes back down to 30, that means that even sizable shares of Republicans are positively turned off, and will stay home or cross over.

kelticwizard wrote:
Here are the last eight polls from Pollingreport.com. I sure don't see any wildly encouraging news for Republicans here.

Here, I've uploaded the graphs from Political Arithmetik to Imageshack (dont tell 'm, or better yet, just do still also go to his site, its great feed for electoral junkies).

This would be what could provide Republicans some current comfort (the trend line in blue, the ABC/WaPo poll in pink):

http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/5029/currentbushapproval20060907sz0.png


But well, let's wait and see if this apparent uptick in Bush approval will actually have any effect on Congress races - and, of course, whether the bump extends much past the Sept. 11 commemorations at all - or whether it turns out to just be another temporary hiccup in the perennial downward spiral.

Because that is, for sure, what we've seen so far:

http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/4584/bushfullterm20060910od4.png
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Sep, 2006 07:08 am
http://i2.tinypic.com/2s8kc9i.jpg
Copied/pasted from today's Chicago Tribune, page 2


(Related article: GOP Moderate Chafee Wins R.I. Primary
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Sep, 2006 08:31 am
Keith Ellison won the Minnesota 5th District DFL primary, so he stands a good chance of becoming the first Muslim member of congress.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Oz fest 2004 - Question by Love2is0evol
Human Events Names Man of the Year, 2004 - Discussion by gungasnake
Your 2004 mix tape - Discussion by boomerang
BUSH WON FAIR AND SQUARE... - Discussion by Frank Apisa
Weeping and gnashing of teeth - Discussion by FreeDuck
WOW! Why Andrew Sullivan is supporting John Kerry - Discussion by BumbleBeeBoogie
Margarate Hassan - hostage in Iraq - Discussion by msolga
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.69 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 08:48:17