Finn dAbuzz wrote:
No. I don't see your point.
I wasn't making a point yet.
I'll make one now. This pneumonia situation was a lose-lose for Hillary.
If she told everyone about her diagnosis on Friday when it happened, people inclined to knock her down would have said "See, Hillary really is sick and can't stay healthy enough to do the job". Some people (you?) would question whether or not the pneumonia was a cover up, just as some are doing now (you).
Tell the public or not tell the public, either way Hillary loses. That's true with many things involving Hillary and the Clintons.
If you faced with a lose-lose situation does it really matter what you choose?