Thu 14 Jul, 2016 10:31 am
Nothing! Both are bullies that don't want alternative views to be discussed or even mentioned. Both make the false claim that they are superior to others. They treat their theories as facts, both without supporting evidence. Both attempt to rule the world but just as Hitlerism met it's fate, soon enough Darwinism will meet it's fate.
Scientists are unable to provide a single thread of proving Darwinism. Similarly, both sects are from the common decent of white supremacy. What's wrong with that picture?
Yes, both should be treated as "hate groups".
@Expert2,
Hitlerism is the fascistic and nationalist theories of Adolph Hitler and the Nazis.
Darwinism is the theory of the evolution of species by natural selection as advanced by Charles Darwin.
That is the difference between Hitlerism and Darwinism.
Why would you confuse these two things?
I don't know what "Hitlerism" actually should be - that term isn't used here in Germany. (Nazism respectively neo-Nazism would be correct.)
But primarily I thnk, compararing anything to Hitler and what was done under his dictatorship, is an act of deepest disrespect to the million victims and their families.
@TomTomBinks,
Really, it's more like the difference between philosophy and a chicken.
@Walter Hinteler,
It's not a word used by people who are educated.
@Walter Hinteler,
Haven't you ever heard of neo-Darwinism? lol....
@Jay2know,
Jay2know wrote:Haven't you ever heard of neo-Darwinism?
I have: learnt about the
Weismann barrier etc at school, more than 50 years ago. Must have missed the connection the neo-Nazism and didn't get to know about it the decades later as well.
@Walter Hinteler,
Let me help you. Neo-Nazism and Neo-Darwinism have the
common descent from white supremacy. Now prove me wrong. Why are the founders all white?
@Jay2know,
Why are you changing the subject from the thread title?
Perhaps the OP would like to discuss Darwinism, not neo-Darwinism.
(Hitlerism doesn't exist, so we'll just drop that completely)
@Jay2know,
Jay2know wrote:Neo-Nazism and Neo-Darwinism have the common descent from white supremacy.
Well,
Weismann doesn't mean mean
white man but 'wise man' or "weizen mann" (wheat man).
And neo-Nazism descents from surviving members of the NSDAP.
You've got different primary sources?
@roger,
COMMON DESCENT.... learn what it means before speaking out of ur ars.
@Jay2know,
Ummmmm good point (Common descent). Common descent is something that neo-Darwinists would not like to discuss?
Isn't that being hypocritical?
@Walter Hinteler,
So if 'common descent' is a fact? Can't we include the KKK to Darwinism? Common descent would be white supremacy. Or is this just another 'hate group'? You tell me. If we all came from monkeys are monkeys to blame? Or can we blame those silly reptiles?
@Freddie2,
Quote: Common descent is something that neo-Darwinists would not like to discuss? Isn't that being hypocritical?
There is an apocryphal story that some prominent English church figure said, on hearing of Darwin's theory, "Descended from the apes? Let us hope it is not true, but if it is, let us pray that it will not become generally known.’
@Freddie2,
The KKK is a Christian terrorist group. They oppose evolution as strongly as anyone on this thread.
It is a fact that most White Supremacists in the US are Bible Believing Christians.
@Freddie2,
Freddie, I wonder if you and Expert2 and Jay2know are one and the same person.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace