@snood,
I did not, of course, mention evil doers. Not find a single example? From May, 2006, at the bottom of the first page of a thread about Islam, in which not a single anti-religious remark or insult of the author had been posted (Xingu did note the great pleasure he experiences in ignoring religion), you wrote,
in your post #2067461
snood wrote:Hey kev - just to let you know...
A lot of people just post on the religion threads to criticize and ridicule. Be aware, they don't have good intentions toward you.
If they were acting on good motives, they would leave the religious threads to those with religion, or at least make an effort to treat the religions with some respect. But as you can see, their intentions are not positive.
I just wanted to let you know, so that you don't expect anyone here to try to discuss your posts seriously.
Dyslexia did post to comment on how much he loves jello. You are suffering from a bad case of confirmation bias, especially if you cannot recognize how often "the faithful" (i.e., the god botherers, the ones who are always telling god what to do and think) come here to pick fights with atheists, as though atheists were some monolith of people who all think alike. I didn't say that you personally accuse so-called atheists of being amoral or immoral. There's enough loons around here to do that that you can rest easy. I don't consider you a loon, although you certainly seem to be awfully thin-skinned when it comes to your imaginary friend. If you consider imaginary friend to be a pejorative term, just give us credible evidence that your magic sky daddy is really there--you'll be famous for sure, possibly rich, and certainly can shut up the evil non-believers (the term i actually used) for all time.
EDIT: If you truly had good intentions toward non-believers, you'd leave threads by and about non-believers alone. Want me to find some examples of that?
