Extortion

Sounds more like blackmail.

roger-

Thank you.

According to wikipedia.com:

"In blackmail, which always involves extortion, the extortionist threatens to reveal information about a victim or their family members that is potentially embarrassing, socially damaging, or incriminating unless a demand for money, property, or services is met."

that's the sort of thing courts decide

Ok, here's some black mail:


And here is a torsion that is no more:

I had to look up the difference between the two (blackmail and extortion), because I wasn't quite sure:
Extortion is a form of theft that occurs when an offender obtains money, property, or services from another person through coercion. To constitute coercion, the necessary act can be the threat of violence, destruction of property, or improper government action. Inaction of the testimony or the withholding of testimony in a legal action are also acts that constitute coercion.

Blackmail, in contrast to extortion, is when the offender threatens to reveal information about a victim or his family members that is potentially embarrassing, socially damaging, or incriminating unless a demand for money, property, or services is met. Even if the information is true or actually incriminating, you can still be charged with blackmail if you threaten to reveal it unless the victim meets your demand.

http://criminal-law.freeadvice.com/criminal-law/white_collar_crimes/extortion_blackmail.htm

He (extorter) is guilty of witholding information.
Only, at the point of (profit-acquistion) is he guilty of extortion.
He is only, up to this point, guilty of attempted extortion.

he ady blackmail say, he will spill the beans unless paid him to keep quiet. But to proof is blackmail need evidence . First voice record from the minor that become adult of him extort Dennis. 2nd , hangover money to him take picture as evidence .

But high status like Speaker Hastert is better off , twist the story say the minor poison her with sleeping pill then the minors sexual contact with her.