Quote:You're a sophmore. You have a lot of growing up to do before you can truly perceive the meaning of maturity.
Let me get this straight...
1) You give wrong advice to someone asking about language.
2) I correct you.
3) You throw a temper tantrum and say that you are still right, and say that I am immature.
4) I calmly respond, still haven't insulted you.
5) You get even madder, start writing in bold, and say that I cannot even comprehend the level of maturity that you have.
I guess, if this is how you define maturity, then you're right I will never be as "mature" as you.
I stand by my earlier reply to Navigator. I did not feel he had grounds to complain given the excessive amount of help he was already getting.
Quote:There was nothing blatantly wrong with any of my suggestions in this thread. You know it, but you were just being an a$$.
Will you please stop getting emotional? My interest in this conversation is purely grammatical...I was not intending to be an "ass", I was just doing what I expect everyone to do for me, which is correct me if I happen to give wrong advice. This is one of the best ways to learn. There's no need to take it personally.
Quote:You obviously resented Navigator's recent post. You wanted to punish Navigator for his "unthankful attitude." You want the entire board to abandon all efforts to help him. Therefore, you were determined to attack any person who attempted to help him.
I have no desire to assist Navigator if that means that I have to get in a pissing match with you after every post. You achieved your goal. Are you a pleased with yourself?
I have no idea where you came up with these wild assertions. Indeed, I did resent Navigators post...but that is no secret, because I said that in plain English. However, I obviously did not mean to "punish" Navigotor, because I am still here trying to help him on this thread. I am sorry that you think I "attacked" you, that is not the case. You said something that was wrong, I thought that Navigator deserved to know it, and I thought that you would be grateful to me for being corrected...as I would be, because none of us are perfect (I do not think that I am perfect) and we should be happy at any opportunity to improve our writing skills.
And I think it is evident that my goal has not been achieved, or else I would not still be talking on this thread...my goal was simply to clear up the misunderstanding, which has evidently become more difficult than I expected.
Quote:Deb, I think you win.
Please, this is NOT a fight--at least not from my perspective. We are adults...
Quote:(Why don't you check out your own sentences and count the grammatical errors.)
Of course, I make grammatical errors; we all do. But there is quite a substantial difference between making a grammatical error in conversation text versus when correcting someone elses grammar.
Indeed, I expect that if I happen to make a grammatical correction which is in fact wrong, people will correct me! The forum would be useless if they did not. It is their "civic duty."
Quote:This was my suggestion for a rewrite:
"I thought a colon was used to introduce dialogue."
Here is your suggestion:
"I thought a colon was used before a quote"
Your suggestion here is perfectly valid. In fact, it's better to say "introduce dialogue" than "a quote." However, you make 2 suggestions, and indicated that they were both valid. I did not mention this one because it was valid. In your other correction, you did correct one thing...but you cannot just correct one mistake and then say the sentence is valid, because that implies that the other mistake does not exist.
You DID imply that this was a valid sentence: "I thought we use colon before someone talking."
And it is not a valid sentence because "thought" is in past tense and "use" is in present tense. Beyond that, it is also not correct to say "before someone talking" there needs to be an "is" inserted after someone because you need a conjugation of the verb "to be". is? was?
"I don't know anything more than you do"
This sentence is intended to say that one person does not know more than another. By putting the word "thing" in there, it changes the meaning to "I don't know anything", which is a complete sentence itself, and makes the entire sentence into a compound sentence whose second simple sentence is incomplete.
edit - just because something is used in speech in your neck of the woods doesn't make it grammatically correct.